dlm: limit rcom debug messages
Unify the checking for both types of ignored
rcom messages, and replace the two log_debug
statements with a single, rate limited debug
message.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
index 3a564d1..0e74832 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/dlm.h>
@@ -74,6 +75,13 @@
(ls)->ls_name , ##args); \
} while (0)
+#define log_limit(ls, fmt, args...) \
+do { \
+ if (dlm_config.ci_log_debug) \
+ printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG "dlm: %s: " fmt "\n", \
+ (ls)->ls_name , ##args); \
+} while (0)
+
#define DLM_ASSERT(x, do) \
{ \
if (!(x)) \
diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
index ac5c616..6565fd5 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c
@@ -486,47 +486,39 @@
return 0;
}
-static int is_old_reply(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc)
-{
- uint64_t seq;
- int rv = 0;
-
- switch (rc->rc_type) {
- case DLM_RCOM_STATUS_REPLY:
- case DLM_RCOM_NAMES_REPLY:
- case DLM_RCOM_LOOKUP_REPLY:
- case DLM_RCOM_LOCK_REPLY:
- spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
- seq = ls->ls_recover_seq;
- spin_unlock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
- if (rc->rc_seq_reply != seq) {
- log_debug(ls, "ignoring old reply %x from %d "
- "seq_reply %llx expect %llx",
- rc->rc_type, rc->rc_header.h_nodeid,
- (unsigned long long)rc->rc_seq_reply,
- (unsigned long long)seq);
- rv = 1;
- }
- }
- return rv;
-}
-
/* Called by dlm_recv; corresponds to dlm_receive_message() but special
recovery-only comms are sent through here. */
void dlm_receive_rcom(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc, int nodeid)
{
int lock_size = sizeof(struct dlm_rcom) + sizeof(struct rcom_lock);
+ int stop, reply = 0;
+ uint64_t seq;
- if (dlm_recovery_stopped(ls) && (rc->rc_type != DLM_RCOM_STATUS)) {
- log_debug(ls, "ignoring recovery message %x from %d",
- rc->rc_type, nodeid);
+ switch (rc->rc_type) {
+ case DLM_RCOM_STATUS_REPLY:
+ case DLM_RCOM_NAMES_REPLY:
+ case DLM_RCOM_LOOKUP_REPLY:
+ case DLM_RCOM_LOCK_REPLY:
+ reply = 1;
+ };
+
+ spin_lock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
+ stop = test_bit(LSFL_RECOVERY_STOP, &ls->ls_flags);
+ seq = ls->ls_recover_seq;
+ spin_unlock(&ls->ls_recover_lock);
+
+ if ((stop && (rc->rc_type != DLM_RCOM_STATUS)) ||
+ (reply && (rc->rc_seq_reply != seq))) {
+ log_limit(ls, "dlm_receive_rcom ignore msg %d "
+ "from %d %llu %llu seq %llu",
+ rc->rc_type, nodeid,
+ (unsigned long long)rc->rc_seq,
+ (unsigned long long)rc->rc_seq_reply,
+ (unsigned long long)seq);
goto out;
}
- if (is_old_reply(ls, rc))
- goto out;
-
switch (rc->rc_type) {
case DLM_RCOM_STATUS:
receive_rcom_status(ls, rc);