Don't pass inode to ->d_hash() and ->d_compare()
Instances either don't look at it at all (the majority of cases) or
only want it to find the superblock (which can be had as dentry->d_sb).
A few cases that want more are actually safe with dentry->d_inode -
the only precaution needed is the check that it hadn't been replaced with
NULL by rmdir() or by overwriting rename(), which case should be simply
treated as cache miss.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/fat/namei_msdos.c b/fs/fat/namei_msdos.c
index 081b759..a783b0e 100644
--- a/fs/fat/namei_msdos.c
+++ b/fs/fat/namei_msdos.c
@@ -148,8 +148,7 @@
* that the existing dentry can be used. The msdos fs routines will
* return ENOENT or EINVAL as appropriate.
*/
-static int msdos_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, const struct inode *inode,
- struct qstr *qstr)
+static int msdos_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *qstr)
{
struct fat_mount_options *options = &MSDOS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->options;
unsigned char msdos_name[MSDOS_NAME];
@@ -165,8 +164,7 @@
* Compare two msdos names. If either of the names are invalid,
* we fall back to doing the standard name comparison.
*/
-static int msdos_cmp(const struct dentry *parent, const struct inode *pinode,
- const struct dentry *dentry, const struct inode *inode,
+static int msdos_cmp(const struct dentry *parent, const struct dentry *dentry,
unsigned int len, const char *str, const struct qstr *name)
{
struct fat_mount_options *options = &MSDOS_SB(parent->d_sb)->options;