[PATCH] RTC class: error checks
The rtc_is_valid_tm() routine needs to treat some of the fields it checks as
unsigned, to prevent wrongly accepting invalid rtc_time structs; this is the
same approach used elsewhere in the RTC code for such tests.
Conversely, rtc_proc_show() is missing one invalid-day-of-month test that
rtc_is_valid_tm() makes: there is no day zero.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
index 9812120..ba795a4 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c
@@ -94,12 +94,12 @@
int rtc_valid_tm(struct rtc_time *tm)
{
if (tm->tm_year < 70
- || tm->tm_mon >= 12
+ || ((unsigned)tm->tm_mon) >= 12
|| tm->tm_mday < 1
|| tm->tm_mday > rtc_month_days(tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year + 1900)
- || tm->tm_hour >= 24
- || tm->tm_min >= 60
- || tm->tm_sec >= 60)
+ || ((unsigned)tm->tm_hour) >= 24
+ || ((unsigned)tm->tm_min) >= 60
+ || ((unsigned)tm->tm_sec) >= 60)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;