tree 04ee040434b7652f78c8edd00b59e2d046d70c3a
parent 497372c616bbca98243ee7c3bdd3c48652e94498
author Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> 1557941630 -0500
committer Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 1580289865 +0100

signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig

[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]

The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
exits or execs (as sighand may change).  The is not a locking problem
in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
exceptions.

Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
delivery of the signal.  The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
delivered.

So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
and pointless.

Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.

Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>