rpc: call release_pipe only on last close
I can't see any reason we need to call this until either the kernel or
the last gssd closes the pipe.
Also, this allows to guarantee that open_pipe and release_pipe are
called strictly in pairs; open_pipe on gssd's first open, release_pipe
on gssd's last close (or on the close of the kernel side of the pipe, if
that comes first).
That will make it very easy for the gss code to keep track of which
pipes gssd is using.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
index c9b57f4..3105efb 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
@@ -126,13 +126,14 @@
{
struct rpc_inode *rpci = RPC_I(inode);
struct rpc_pipe_ops *ops;
+ int need_release;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
ops = rpci->ops;
if (ops != NULL) {
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
-
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ need_release = rpci->nreaders != 0 || rpci->nwriters != 0;
rpci->nreaders = 0;
list_splice_init(&rpci->in_upcall, &free_list);
list_splice_init(&rpci->pipe, &free_list);
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
rpc_purge_list(rpci, &free_list, ops->destroy_msg, -EPIPE);
rpci->nwriters = 0;
- if (ops->release_pipe)
+ if (need_release && ops->release_pipe)
ops->release_pipe(inode);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rpci->queue_timeout);
}
@@ -196,6 +197,7 @@
{
struct rpc_inode *rpci = RPC_I(inode);
struct rpc_pipe_msg *msg;
+ int last_close;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (rpci->ops == NULL)
@@ -222,7 +224,8 @@
rpci->ops->destroy_msg, -EAGAIN);
}
}
- if (rpci->ops->release_pipe)
+ last_close = rpci->nwriters == 0 && rpci->nreaders == 0;
+ if (last_close && rpci->ops->release_pipe)
rpci->ops->release_pipe(inode);
out:
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);