locking/lockdep, sched/core: Implement a better lock pinning scheme
The problem with the existing lock pinning is that each pin is of
value 1; this mean you can simply unpin if you know its pinned,
without having any extra information.
This scheme generates a random (16 bit) cookie for each pin and
requires this same cookie to unpin. This means you have to keep the
cookie in context.
No objsize difference for !LOCKDEP kernels.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index ed94109..d7f94f4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
@@ -3554,7 +3555,35 @@
return 0;
}
-static void __lock_pin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+static struct pin_cookie __lock_pin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+ struct pin_cookie cookie = NIL_COOKIE;
+ struct task_struct *curr = current;
+ int i;
+
+ if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
+ return cookie;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
+ struct held_lock *hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+
+ if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
+ /*
+ * Grab 16bits of randomness; this is sufficient to not
+ * be guessable and still allows some pin nesting in
+ * our u32 pin_count.
+ */
+ cookie.val = 1 + (prandom_u32() >> 16);
+ hlock->pin_count += cookie.val;
+ return cookie;
+ }
+ }
+
+ WARN(1, "pinning an unheld lock\n");
+ return cookie;
+}
+
+static void __lock_repin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
int i;
@@ -3566,7 +3595,7 @@
struct held_lock *hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
if (match_held_lock(hlock, lock)) {
- hlock->pin_count++;
+ hlock->pin_count += cookie.val;
return;
}
}
@@ -3574,7 +3603,7 @@
WARN(1, "pinning an unheld lock\n");
}
-static void __lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+static void __lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
int i;
@@ -3589,7 +3618,11 @@
if (WARN(!hlock->pin_count, "unpinning an unpinned lock\n"))
return;
- hlock->pin_count--;
+ hlock->pin_count -= cookie.val;
+
+ if (WARN((int)hlock->pin_count < 0, "pin count corrupted\n"))
+ hlock->pin_count = 0;
+
return;
}
}
@@ -3720,24 +3753,27 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_is_held);
-void lock_pin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+struct pin_cookie lock_pin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
{
+ struct pin_cookie cookie = NIL_COOKIE;
unsigned long flags;
if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
- return;
+ return cookie;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
check_flags(flags);
current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
- __lock_pin_lock(lock);
+ cookie = __lock_pin_lock(lock);
current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ return cookie;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_pin_lock);
-void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+void lock_repin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -3748,7 +3784,24 @@
check_flags(flags);
current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
- __lock_unpin_lock(lock);
+ __lock_repin_lock(lock, cookie);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_repin_lock);
+
+void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+ return;
+
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ check_flags(flags);
+
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+ __lock_unpin_lock(lock, cookie);
current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
}