usb: musb: make modules behave better
There's really no point in doing all that
initcall trickery when we can safely let
udev handle module probing for us.
Remove all of that trickery, by moving everybody
to module_init() and making proper use of
platform_device_register() rather than
platform_device_probe().
Tested-by: Rajashekhara, Sudhakar <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Tested-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot <tasskjapp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
index 2613bfd..01c8f2e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
static u64 da8xx_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-static int __init da8xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devinit da8xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct musb_hdrc_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
struct platform_device *musb;
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
return ret;
}
-static int __exit da8xx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devexit da8xx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct da8xx_glue *glue = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -576,7 +576,8 @@
}
static struct platform_driver da8xx_driver = {
- .remove = __exit_p(da8xx_remove),
+ .probe = da8xx_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(da8xx_remove),
.driver = {
.name = "musb-da8xx",
},
@@ -588,9 +589,9 @@
static int __init da8xx_init(void)
{
- return platform_driver_probe(&da8xx_driver, da8xx_probe);
+ return platform_driver_register(&da8xx_driver);
}
-subsys_initcall(da8xx_init);
+module_init(da8xx_init);
static void __exit da8xx_exit(void)
{