mm, fs: remove remaining PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} usage
Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/compress.c b/fs/ntfs/compress.c
index b6074a5..f2b5e74 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/compress.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/compress.c
@@ -105,10 +105,6 @@
ntfs_debug("Zeroing page region outside initialized size.");
if (((s64)page->index << PAGE_SHIFT) >= initialized_size) {
- /*
- * FIXME: Using clear_page() will become wrong when we get
- * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE but for now there is no problem.
- */
clear_page(kp);
return;
}
@@ -160,7 +156,7 @@
* @xpage_done indicates whether the target page (@dest_pages[@xpage]) was
* completed during the decompression of the compression block (@cb_start).
*
- * Warning: This function *REQUIRES* PAGE_CACHE_SIZE >= 4096 or it will blow up
+ * Warning: This function *REQUIRES* PAGE_SIZE >= 4096 or it will blow up
* unpredicatbly! You have been warned!
*
* Note to hackers: This function may not sleep until it has finished accessing
@@ -462,7 +458,7 @@
* have been written to so that we would lose data if we were to just overwrite
* them with the out-of-date uncompressed data.
*
- * FIXME: For PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > cb_size we are not doing the Right Thing(TM) at
+ * FIXME: For PAGE_SIZE > cb_size we are not doing the Right Thing(TM) at
* the end of the file I think. We need to detect this case and zero the out
* of bounds remainder of the page in question and mark it as handled. At the
* moment we would just return -EIO on such a page. This bug will only become
@@ -470,7 +466,7 @@
* clusters so is probably not going to be seen by anyone. Still this should
* be fixed. (AIA)
*
- * FIXME: Again for PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > cb_size we are screwing up both in
+ * FIXME: Again for PAGE_SIZE > cb_size we are screwing up both in
* handling sparse and compressed cbs. (AIA)
*
* FIXME: At the moment we don't do any zeroing out in the case that
@@ -497,12 +493,12 @@
u64 cb_size_mask = cb_size - 1UL;
VCN vcn;
LCN lcn;
- /* The first wanted vcn (minimum alignment is PAGE_CACHE_SIZE). */
+ /* The first wanted vcn (minimum alignment is PAGE_SIZE). */
VCN start_vcn = (((s64)index << PAGE_SHIFT) & ~cb_size_mask) >>
vol->cluster_size_bits;
/*
* The first vcn after the last wanted vcn (minimum alignment is again
- * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE.
+ * PAGE_SIZE.
*/
VCN end_vcn = ((((s64)(index + 1UL) << PAGE_SHIFT) + cb_size - 1)
& ~cb_size_mask) >> vol->cluster_size_bits;
@@ -753,11 +749,6 @@
for (; cur_page < cb_max_page; cur_page++) {
page = pages[cur_page];
if (page) {
- /*
- * FIXME: Using clear_page() will become wrong
- * when we get PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE but
- * for now there is no problem.
- */
if (likely(!cur_ofs))
clear_page(page_address(page));
else
@@ -807,7 +798,7 @@
* synchronous io for the majority of pages.
* Or if we choose not to do the read-ahead/-behind stuff, we
* could just return block_read_full_page(pages[xpage]) as long
- * as PAGE_CACHE_SIZE <= cb_size.
+ * as PAGE_SIZE <= cb_size.
*/
if (cb_max_ofs)
cb_max_page--;