[PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling
Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and
plain wrong, my fault.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Acked-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index 01d4ab6..f75d7b0 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -370,10 +370,10 @@
struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
int err;
- /* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
+ /* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
* IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
- spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
+ spin_lock(&line->lock);
err = flush_buffer(line);
if (err == 0) {
return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@
line->head = line->buffer;
line->tail = line->buffer;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&line->lock);
if(tty == NULL)
return IRQ_NONE;