tree c562d8e778947ae65288c2f07d53774b4956f5e1
parent 411346640ccd04ea8571eb5871659b0bd33b007e
author Rabin Vincent <rabinv@axis.com> 1493826841 +0200
committer Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 1495283320 +0200

CIFS: fix oplock break deadlocks

commit 3998e6b87d4258a70df358296d6f1c7234012bfe upstream.

When the final cifsFileInfo_put() is called from cifsiod and an oplock
break work is queued, lockdep complains loudly:

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 4.11.0+ #21 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 kworker/0:2/78 is trying to acquire lock:
  ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: flush_work+0x215/0x350

 but task is already holding lock:
  ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock("cifsiod");
   lock("cifsiod");

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 2 locks held by kworker/0:2/78:
  #0:  ("cifsiod"){++++.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0
  #1:  ((&wdata->work)){+.+...}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 78 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.11.0+ #21
 Workqueue: cifsiod cifs_writev_complete
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
  __lock_acquire+0x17dd/0x2260
  ? match_held_lock+0x20/0x2b0
  ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x86/0x130
  ? mark_lock+0xa6/0x920
  lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260
  ? lock_acquire+0xcc/0x260
  ? flush_work+0x215/0x350
  flush_work+0x236/0x350
  ? flush_work+0x215/0x350
  ? destroy_worker+0x170/0x170
  __cancel_work_timer+0x17d/0x210
  ? ___preempt_schedule+0x16/0x18
  cancel_work_sync+0x10/0x20
  cifsFileInfo_put+0x338/0x7f0
  cifs_writedata_release+0x2a/0x40
  ? cifs_writedata_release+0x2a/0x40
  cifs_writev_complete+0x29d/0x850
  ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0
  process_one_work+0x304/0x8e0
  worker_thread+0x9b/0x6a0
  kthread+0x1b2/0x200
  ? process_one_work+0x8e0/0x8e0
  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
  ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40

This is a real warning.  Since the oplock is queued on the same
workqueue this can deadlock if there is only one worker thread active
for the workqueue (which will be the case during memory pressure when
the rescuer thread is handling it).

Furthermore, there is at least one other kind of hang possible due to
the oplock break handling if there is only worker.  (This can be
reproduced without introducing memory pressure by having passing 1 for
the max_active parameter of cifsiod.) cifs_oplock_break() can wait
indefintely in the filemap_fdatawait() while the cifs_writev_complete()
work is blocked:

 sysrq: SysRq : Show Blocked State
   task                        PC stack   pid father
 kworker/0:1     D    0    16      2 0x00000000
 Workqueue: cifsiod cifs_oplock_break
 Call Trace:
  __schedule+0x562/0xf40
  ? mark_held_locks+0x4a/0xb0
  schedule+0x57/0xe0
  io_schedule+0x21/0x50
  wait_on_page_bit+0x143/0x190
  ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x150/0x150
  __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x134/0x190
  ? do_writepages+0x51/0x70
  filemap_fdatawait_range+0x14/0x30
  filemap_fdatawait+0x3b/0x40
  cifs_oplock_break+0x651/0x710
  ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0
  process_one_work+0x304/0x8e0
  worker_thread+0x9b/0x6a0
  kthread+0x1b2/0x200
  ? process_one_work+0x8e0/0x8e0
  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
  ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
 dd              D    0   683    171 0x00000000
 Call Trace:
  __schedule+0x562/0xf40
  ? mark_held_locks+0x29/0xb0
  schedule+0x57/0xe0
  io_schedule+0x21/0x50
  wait_on_page_bit+0x143/0x190
  ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x150/0x150
  __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x134/0x190
  ? do_writepages+0x51/0x70
  filemap_fdatawait_range+0x14/0x30
  filemap_fdatawait+0x3b/0x40
  filemap_write_and_wait+0x4e/0x70
  cifs_flush+0x6a/0xb0
  filp_close+0x52/0xa0
  __close_fd+0xdc/0x150
  SyS_close+0x33/0x60
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe

 Showing all locks held in the system:
 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/16:
  #0:  ("cifsiod"){.+.+.+}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0
  #1:  ((&cfile->oplock_break)){+.+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x255/0x8e0

 Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
 workqueue cifsiod: flags=0xc
   pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/1
     in-flight: 16:cifs_oplock_break
     delayed: cifs_writev_complete, cifs_echo_request
 pool 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 hung=0s workers=3 idle: 750 3

Fix these problems by creating a a new workqueue (with a rescuer) for
the oplock break work.

Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabinv@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>