bonding: don't use bond_next_slave() in bond_info_seq_next()
We don't need the circular loop there and it's the only current user of
bond_next_slave() - so just use the standard bond_for_each_slave().
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
index 7af5646..fb868d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
@@ -31,17 +31,25 @@
static void *bond_info_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bonding *bond = seq->private;
- struct slave *slave = v;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct slave *slave;
+ bool found = false;
++*pos;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
return bond_first_slave(bond);
- if (bond_is_last_slave(bond, slave))
+ if (bond_is_last_slave(bond, v))
return NULL;
- slave = bond_next_slave(bond, slave);
- return slave;
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ if (found)
+ return slave;
+ if (slave == v)
+ found = true;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
}
static void bond_info_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)