cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
[ Upstream commit d46b0da7a33dd8c99d969834f682267a45444ab3 ]
There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
and a disruption occurs causing reconnect. The deadlock is due
a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time. If in
between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
another process, deadlock occurs.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
cifs_strict_readv()
down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
_cifsFileInfo_put
OR
cifs_new_fileinfo
down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
cifs_reopen_file()
down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed--by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 3504ef0..1c3f262 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -280,6 +280,13 @@
return has_locks;
}
+void
+cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
+ msleep(10);
+}
+
struct cifsFileInfo *
cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock)
@@ -305,7 +312,7 @@
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
cfile->llist = fdlocks;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
@@ -457,7 +464,7 @@
* Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
* is closed anyway.
*/
- down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
list_del(&li->llist);
cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
@@ -1011,7 +1018,7 @@
cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
{
struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
}
@@ -1033,7 +1040,7 @@
try_again:
exist = false;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
lock->type, &conf_lock, CIFS_LOCK_OP);
@@ -1055,7 +1062,7 @@
(lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
if (!rc)
goto try_again;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
list_del_init(&lock->blist);
}
@@ -1108,7 +1115,7 @@
return rc;
try_again:
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
return rc;
@@ -1312,7 +1319,7 @@
int rc = 0;
/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
return rc;
@@ -1501,7 +1508,7 @@
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+ cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
cur = buf;
num = 0;