drm/i915: Introduce intel_set_rps()
Replace the valleyview_set_rps() and gen6_set_rps() calls with
intel_set_rps() which itself does the IS_VALLEYVIEW() check. The
code becomes simpler since the callers don't have to do this check
themselves.
Most of the change was performe with the following semantic patch:
@@
expression E1, E2, E3;
@@
- if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(E1)) {
- valleyview_set_rps(E2, E3);
- } else {
- gen6_set_rps(E2, E3);
- }
+ intel_set_rps(E2, E3);
Adding intel_set_rps() and making valleyview_set_rps() and gen6_set_rps()
static was done manually. Also valleyview_set_rps() had to be moved a
bit avoid a forward declaration.
v2: Use a less greedy semantic patch
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
index 49f5ade..cdc9da0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
@@ -402,10 +402,7 @@
/* We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and
* update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
* frequency request may be unchanged. */
- if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
- valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
- else
- gen6_set_rps(dev, val);
+ intel_set_rps(dev, val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
@@ -464,10 +461,7 @@
/* We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and
* update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
* frequency request may be unchanged. */
- if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
- valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
- else
- gen6_set_rps(dev, val);
+ intel_set_rps(dev, val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);