blob: 1fc4e7144dcea6fb08260f93686b495e47d101b4 [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001
2 How to Get Your Change Into the Linux Kernel
3 or
4 Care And Operation Of Your Linus Torvalds
5
6
7
8For a person or company who wishes to submit a change to the Linux
9kernel, the process can sometimes be daunting if you're not familiar
10with "the system." This text is a collection of suggestions which
11can greatly increase the chances of your change being accepted.
12
Randy Dunlapbc7455f2006-07-30 03:03:45 -070013Read Documentation/SubmitChecklist for a list of items to check
14before submitting code. If you are submitting a driver, also read
15Documentation/SubmittingDrivers.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070016
17
18
19--------------------------------------------
20SECTION 1 - CREATING AND SENDING YOUR CHANGE
21--------------------------------------------
22
23
24
251) "diff -up"
26------------
27
28Use "diff -up" or "diff -uprN" to create patches.
29
30All changes to the Linux kernel occur in the form of patches, as
31generated by diff(1). When creating your patch, make sure to create it
32in "unified diff" format, as supplied by the '-u' argument to diff(1).
33Also, please use the '-p' argument which shows which C function each
34change is in - that makes the resultant diff a lot easier to read.
35Patches should be based in the root kernel source directory,
36not in any lower subdirectory.
37
38To create a patch for a single file, it is often sufficient to do:
39
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070040 SRCTREE= linux-2.6
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070041 MYFILE= drivers/net/mydriver.c
42
43 cd $SRCTREE
44 cp $MYFILE $MYFILE.orig
45 vi $MYFILE # make your change
46 cd ..
47 diff -up $SRCTREE/$MYFILE{.orig,} > /tmp/patch
48
49To create a patch for multiple files, you should unpack a "vanilla",
50or unmodified kernel source tree, and generate a diff against your
51own source tree. For example:
52
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070053 MYSRC= /devel/linux-2.6
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070054
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070055 tar xvfz linux-2.6.12.tar.gz
56 mv linux-2.6.12 linux-2.6.12-vanilla
57 diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.12-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff \
58 linux-2.6.12-vanilla $MYSRC > /tmp/patch
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070059
60"dontdiff" is a list of files which are generated by the kernel during
61the build process, and should be ignored in any diff(1)-generated
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070062patch. The "dontdiff" file is included in the kernel tree in
632.6.12 and later. For earlier kernel versions, you can get it
64from <http://www.xenotime.net/linux/doc/dontdiff>.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070065
66Make sure your patch does not include any extra files which do not
67belong in a patch submission. Make sure to review your patch -after-
68generated it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
69
70If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you may want to look into
71splitting them into individual patches which modify things in
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070072logical stages. This will facilitate easier reviewing by other
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070073kernel developers, very important if you want your patch accepted.
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070074There are a number of scripts which can aid in this:
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070075
76Quilt:
77http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt
78
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070079Andrew Morton's patch scripts:
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -080080http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/
81Instead of these scripts, quilt is the recommended patch management
82tool (see above).
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -070083
84
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070085
862) Describe your changes.
87
88Describe the technical detail of the change(s) your patch includes.
89
90Be as specific as possible. The WORST descriptions possible include
91things like "update driver X", "bug fix for driver X", or "this patch
92includes updates for subsystem X. Please apply."
93
94If your description starts to get long, that's a sign that you probably
95need to split up your patch. See #3, next.
96
97
98
993) Separate your changes.
100
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800101Separate _logical changes_ into a single patch file.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700102
103For example, if your changes include both bug fixes and performance
104enhancements for a single driver, separate those changes into two
105or more patches. If your changes include an API update, and a new
106driver which uses that new API, separate those into two patches.
107
108On the other hand, if you make a single change to numerous files,
109group those changes into a single patch. Thus a single logical change
110is contained within a single patch.
111
112If one patch depends on another patch in order for a change to be
113complete, that is OK. Simply note "this patch depends on patch X"
114in your patch description.
115
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800116If you cannot condense your patch set into a smaller set of patches,
117then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration.
118
119
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700120
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -07001214) Style check your changes.
122
123Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
124found in Documentation/CodingStyle. Failure to do so simply wastes
Linus Nilssonf56d35e2007-07-21 17:49:06 +0200125the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700126without even being read.
127
128At a minimum you should check your patches with the patch style
Andre Haupta570ab62007-09-11 15:23:47 -0700129checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl). You should
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700130be able to justify all violations that remain in your patch.
131
132
133
1345) Select e-mail destination.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700135
136Look through the MAINTAINERS file and the source code, and determine
137if your change applies to a specific subsystem of the kernel, with
138an assigned maintainer. If so, e-mail that person.
139
140If no maintainer is listed, or the maintainer does not respond, send
141your patch to the primary Linux kernel developer's mailing list,
142linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. Most kernel developers monitor this
143e-mail list, and can comment on your changes.
144
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800145
146Do not send more than 15 patches at once to the vger mailing lists!!!
147
148
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700149Linus Torvalds is the final arbiter of all changes accepted into the
Linus Torvalds99ddcc72007-01-23 14:22:35 -0800150Linux kernel. His e-mail address is <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.
151He gets a lot of e-mail, so typically you should do your best to -avoid-
152sending him e-mail.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700153
154Patches which are bug fixes, are "obvious" changes, or similarly
155require little discussion should be sent or CC'd to Linus. Patches
156which require discussion or do not have a clear advantage should
157usually be sent first to linux-kernel. Only after the patch is
158discussed should the patch then be submitted to Linus.
159
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700160
161
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -07001626) Select your CC (e-mail carbon copy) list.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700163
164Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
165
166Other kernel developers besides Linus need to be aware of your change,
167so that they may comment on it and offer code review and suggestions.
168linux-kernel is the primary Linux kernel developer mailing list.
169Other mailing lists are available for specific subsystems, such as
170USB, framebuffer devices, the VFS, the SCSI subsystem, etc. See the
171MAINTAINERS file for a mailing list that relates specifically to
172your change.
173
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800174Majordomo lists of VGER.KERNEL.ORG at:
175 <http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html>
176
Paul Jackson1caf1f02005-07-31 22:34:48 -0700177If changes affect userland-kernel interfaces, please send
178the MAN-PAGES maintainer (as listed in the MAINTAINERS file)
179a man-pages patch, or at least a notification of the change,
180so that some information makes its way into the manual pages.
181
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700182Even if the maintainer did not respond in step #4, make sure to ALWAYS
183copy the maintainer when you change their code.
184
185For small patches you may want to CC the Trivial Patch Monkey
Kees Cookf62870d2006-01-03 13:33:31 +0100186trivial@kernel.org managed by Adrian Bunk; which collects "trivial"
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700187patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
188 Spelling fixes in documentation
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700189 Spelling fixes which could break grep(1)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700190 Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
191 Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
192 Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700193 Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700194 Contact detail and documentation fixes
195 Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific,
196 since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700197 Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700198 in re-transmission mode)
Kees Cookf62870d2006-01-03 13:33:31 +0100199URL: <http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/trivial/>
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -0700200
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700201
202
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -07002037) No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments. Just plain text.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700204
205Linus and other kernel developers need to be able to read and comment
206on the changes you are submitting. It is important for a kernel
207developer to be able to "quote" your changes, using standard e-mail
208tools, so that they may comment on specific portions of your code.
209
210For this reason, all patches should be submitting e-mail "inline".
211WARNING: Be wary of your editor's word-wrap corrupting your patch,
212if you choose to cut-n-paste your patch.
213
214Do not attach the patch as a MIME attachment, compressed or not.
215Many popular e-mail applications will not always transmit a MIME
216attachment as plain text, making it impossible to comment on your
217code. A MIME attachment also takes Linus a bit more time to process,
218decreasing the likelihood of your MIME-attached change being accepted.
219
220Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
221you to re-send them using MIME.
222
Michael Opdenacker097091c2008-02-03 18:06:58 +0200223See Documentation/email-clients.txt for hints about configuring
224your e-mail client so that it sends your patches untouched.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700225
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -07002268) E-mail size.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700227
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700228When sending patches to Linus, always follow step #7.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700229
230Large changes are not appropriate for mailing lists, and some
231maintainers. If your patch, uncompressed, exceeds 40 kB in size,
232it is preferred that you store your patch on an Internet-accessible
233server, and provide instead a URL (link) pointing to your patch.
234
235
236
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -07002379) Name your kernel version.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700238
239It is important to note, either in the subject line or in the patch
240description, the kernel version to which this patch applies.
241
242If the patch does not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version,
243Linus will not apply it.
244
245
246
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -070024710) Don't get discouraged. Re-submit.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700248
249After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait. If Linus
250likes your change and applies it, it will appear in the next version
251of the kernel that he releases.
252
253However, if your change doesn't appear in the next version of the
254kernel, there could be any number of reasons. It's YOUR job to
255narrow down those reasons, correct what was wrong, and submit your
256updated change.
257
258It is quite common for Linus to "drop" your patch without comment.
259That's the nature of the system. If he drops your patch, it could be
260due to
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700261* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700262* Your patch was not sufficiently discussed on linux-kernel.
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700263* A style issue (see section 2).
264* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section).
265* A technical problem with your change.
266* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle.
267* You are being annoying.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700268
269When in doubt, solicit comments on linux-kernel mailing list.
270
271
272
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -070027311) Include PATCH in the subject
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700274
275Due to high e-mail traffic to Linus, and to linux-kernel, it is common
276convention to prefix your subject line with [PATCH]. This lets Linus
277and other kernel developers more easily distinguish patches from other
278e-mail discussions.
279
280
281
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -070028212) Sign your work
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700283
284To improve tracking of who did what, especially with patches that can
285percolate to their final resting place in the kernel through several
286layers of maintainers, we've introduced a "sign-off" procedure on
287patches that are being emailed around.
288
289The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the
290patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to
291pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you
292can certify the below:
293
Linus Torvaldscbd83da2005-06-13 17:51:55 -0700294 Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700295
296 By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
297
298 (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
299 have the right to submit it under the open source license
300 indicated in the file; or
301
302 (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
303 of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
304 license and I have the right under that license to submit that
305 work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
306 by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
307 permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
308 in the file; or
309
310 (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
311 person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
312 it.
313
Linus Torvaldscbd83da2005-06-13 17:51:55 -0700314 (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
315 are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
316 personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
317 maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
318 this project or the open source license(s) involved.
319
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700320then you just add a line saying
321
Alexey Dobriyan9fd55592005-06-25 14:59:34 -0700322 Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700323
Greg KHaf45f322006-09-12 20:35:52 -0700324using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
325
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700326Some people also put extra tags at the end. They'll just be ignored for
327now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just
328point out some special detail about the sign-off.
329
330
Jonathan Corbetef402032008-03-28 11:22:38 -060033113) When to use Acked-by: and Cc:
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700332
Andrew Morton0f44cd22007-06-08 13:46:45 -0700333The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
334development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
335
336If a person was not directly involved in the preparation or handling of a
337patch but wishes to signify and record their approval of it then they can
338arrange to have an Acked-by: line added to the patch's changelog.
339
340Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that
341maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch.
342
343Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
344has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. Hence patch
345mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
346into an Acked-by:.
347
348Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch.
349For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from
350one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just
351the part which affects that maintainer's code. Judgement should be used here.
Jonathan Corbetef402032008-03-28 11:22:38 -0600352When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing
Andrew Morton0f44cd22007-06-08 13:46:45 -0700353list archives.
354
Jonathan Corbetef402032008-03-28 11:22:38 -0600355If a person has had the opportunity to comment on a patch, but has not
356provided such comments, you may optionally add a "Cc:" tag to the patch.
357This is the only tag which might be added without an explicit action by the
358person it names. This tag documents that potentially interested parties
359have been included in the discussion
Andrew Morton0f44cd22007-06-08 13:46:45 -0700360
Jonathan Corbetef402032008-03-28 11:22:38 -0600361
36214) Using Test-by: and Reviewed-by:
363
364A Tested-by: tag indicates that the patch has been successfully tested (in
365some environment) by the person named. This tag informs maintainers that
366some testing has been performed, provides a means to locate testers for
367future patches, and ensures credit for the testers.
368
369Reviewed-by:, instead, indicates that the patch has been reviewed and found
370acceptable according to the Reviewer's Statement:
371
372 Reviewer's statement of oversight
373
374 By offering my Reviewed-by: tag, I state that:
375
376 (a) I have carried out a technical review of this patch to
377 evaluate its appropriateness and readiness for inclusion into
378 the mainline kernel.
379
380 (b) Any problems, concerns, or questions relating to the patch
381 have been communicated back to the submitter. I am satisfied
382 with the submitter's response to my comments.
383
384 (c) While there may be things that could be improved with this
385 submission, I believe that it is, at this time, (1) a
386 worthwhile modification to the kernel, and (2) free of known
387 issues which would argue against its inclusion.
388
389 (d) While I have reviewed the patch and believe it to be sound, I
390 do not (unless explicitly stated elsewhere) make any
391 warranties or guarantees that it will achieve its stated
392 purpose or function properly in any given situation.
393
394A Reviewed-by tag is a statement of opinion that the patch is an
395appropriate modification of the kernel without any remaining serious
396technical issues. Any interested reviewer (who has done the work) can
397offer a Reviewed-by tag for a patch. This tag serves to give credit to
398reviewers and to inform maintainers of the degree of review which has been
399done on the patch. Reviewed-by: tags, when supplied by reviewers known to
400understand the subject area and to perform thorough reviews, will normally
401increase the liklihood of your patch getting into the kernel.
402
403
40415) The canonical patch format
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -0700405
Paul Jackson75f84262005-10-02 18:01:42 -0700406The canonical patch subject line is:
407
Paul Jacksond6b9acc2005-10-03 00:29:10 -0700408 Subject: [PATCH 001/123] subsystem: summary phrase
Paul Jackson75f84262005-10-02 18:01:42 -0700409
410The canonical patch message body contains the following:
411
412 - A "from" line specifying the patch author.
413
414 - An empty line.
415
416 - The body of the explanation, which will be copied to the
417 permanent changelog to describe this patch.
418
419 - The "Signed-off-by:" lines, described above, which will
420 also go in the changelog.
421
422 - A marker line containing simply "---".
423
424 - Any additional comments not suitable for the changelog.
425
426 - The actual patch (diff output).
427
428The Subject line format makes it very easy to sort the emails
429alphabetically by subject line - pretty much any email reader will
430support that - since because the sequence number is zero-padded,
431the numerical and alphabetic sort is the same.
432
Paul Jacksond6b9acc2005-10-03 00:29:10 -0700433The "subsystem" in the email's Subject should identify which
434area or subsystem of the kernel is being patched.
435
436The "summary phrase" in the email's Subject should concisely
437describe the patch which that email contains. The "summary
438phrase" should not be a filename. Do not use the same "summary
Randy Dunlap66effdc2007-05-09 02:33:42 -0700439phrase" for every patch in a whole patch series (where a "patch
440series" is an ordered sequence of multiple, related patches).
Paul Jacksond6b9acc2005-10-03 00:29:10 -0700441
442Bear in mind that the "summary phrase" of your email becomes
443a globally-unique identifier for that patch. It propagates
444all the way into the git changelog. The "summary phrase" may
445later be used in developer discussions which refer to the patch.
446People will want to google for the "summary phrase" to read
447discussion regarding that patch.
448
449A couple of example Subjects:
450
451 Subject: [patch 2/5] ext2: improve scalability of bitmap searching
452 Subject: [PATCHv2 001/207] x86: fix eflags tracking
Paul Jackson75f84262005-10-02 18:01:42 -0700453
454The "from" line must be the very first line in the message body,
455and has the form:
456
457 From: Original Author <author@example.com>
458
459The "from" line specifies who will be credited as the author of the
460patch in the permanent changelog. If the "from" line is missing,
461then the "From:" line from the email header will be used to determine
462the patch author in the changelog.
463
464The explanation body will be committed to the permanent source
465changelog, so should make sense to a competent reader who has long
466since forgotten the immediate details of the discussion that might
467have led to this patch.
468
469The "---" marker line serves the essential purpose of marking for patch
470handling tools where the changelog message ends.
471
472One good use for the additional comments after the "---" marker is for
473a diffstat, to show what files have changed, and the number of inserted
474and deleted lines per file. A diffstat is especially useful on bigger
475patches. Other comments relevant only to the moment or the maintainer,
476not suitable for the permanent changelog, should also go here.
Randy Dunlap58591e82006-01-08 01:04:52 -0800477Use diffstat options "-p 1 -w 70" so that filenames are listed from the
478top of the kernel source tree and don't use too much horizontal space
479(easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation).
Paul Jackson75f84262005-10-02 18:01:42 -0700480
481See more details on the proper patch format in the following
482references.
483
484
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -0700485
486
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700487-----------------------------------
488SECTION 2 - HINTS, TIPS, AND TRICKS
489-----------------------------------
490
491This section lists many of the common "rules" associated with code
492submitted to the kernel. There are always exceptions... but you must
493have a really good reason for doing so. You could probably call this
494section Linus Computer Science 101.
495
496
497
4981) Read Documentation/CodingStyle
499
500Nuff said. If your code deviates too much from this, it is likely
501to be rejected without further review, and without comment.
502
Keiichi Kii5ab3bd52007-10-26 15:51:44 +0900503One significant exception is when moving code from one file to
504another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in
Andy Whitcroftde7d4f02007-07-15 23:37:22 -0700505the same patch which moves it. This clearly delineates the act of
506moving the code and your changes. This greatly aids review of the
507actual differences and allows tools to better track the history of
508the code itself.
509
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700510Check your patches with the patch style checker prior to submission
Andy Whitcroftde7d4f02007-07-15 23:37:22 -0700511(scripts/checkpatch.pl). The style checker should be viewed as
512a guide not as the final word. If your code looks better with
513a violation then its probably best left alone.
514
515The checker reports at three levels:
516 - ERROR: things that are very likely to be wrong
517 - WARNING: things requiring careful review
518 - CHECK: things requiring thought
519
520You should be able to justify all violations that remain in your
521patch.
Andy Whitcroft0a920b52007-06-01 00:46:48 -0700522
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700523
524
5252) #ifdefs are ugly
526
527Code cluttered with ifdefs is difficult to read and maintain. Don't do
528it. Instead, put your ifdefs in a header, and conditionally define
529'static inline' functions, or macros, which are used in the code.
530Let the compiler optimize away the "no-op" case.
531
532Simple example, of poor code:
533
534 dev = alloc_etherdev (sizeof(struct funky_private));
535 if (!dev)
536 return -ENODEV;
537 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_FUNKINESS
538 init_funky_net(dev);
539 #endif
540
541Cleaned-up example:
542
543(in header)
544 #ifndef CONFIG_NET_FUNKINESS
545 static inline void init_funky_net (struct net_device *d) {}
546 #endif
547
548(in the code itself)
549 dev = alloc_etherdev (sizeof(struct funky_private));
550 if (!dev)
551 return -ENODEV;
552 init_funky_net(dev);
553
554
555
5563) 'static inline' is better than a macro
557
558Static inline functions are greatly preferred over macros.
559They provide type safety, have no length limitations, no formatting
560limitations, and under gcc they are as cheap as macros.
561
562Macros should only be used for cases where a static inline is clearly
Jim Meyeringf2b2ea62008-04-02 13:04:46 -0700563suboptimal [there are a few, isolated cases of this in fast paths],
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700564or where it is impossible to use a static inline function [such as
565string-izing].
566
567'static inline' is preferred over 'static __inline__', 'extern inline',
568and 'extern __inline__'.
569
570
571
5724) Don't over-design.
573
574Don't try to anticipate nebulous future cases which may or may not
Randy Dunlap84da7c02005-06-28 20:45:30 -0700575be useful: "Make it as simple as you can, and no simpler."
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700576
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800577
578
579----------------------
580SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
581----------------------
582
583Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
584 <http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt>
585
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700586Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format".
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800587 <http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html>
588
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700589Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800590 <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/03/31/>
591 <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/07/08/>
592 <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/10/19/>
Xose Vazquez Pereze1b114e2006-01-14 12:57:41 +0100593 <http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/01/11/>
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800594
Randy Dunlapbc7455f2006-07-30 03:03:45 -0700595NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800596 <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112112749912944&w=2>
597
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700598Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
Qi Yong4db29c12007-06-12 13:06:49 +0800599 <http://users.sosdg.org/~qiyong/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800600
Pavel Machek8e9cb8f2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700601Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
Xose Vazquez Perez5b0ed2c2006-01-08 01:02:49 -0800602 <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
603--