blob: 0c5033a58c9e5fa9ce53d407d1bc32ae69df561d [file] [log] [blame]
Zachary Amsdenf392eb22010-08-19 22:07:33 -10001
2 Timekeeping Virtualization for X86-Based Architectures
3
4 Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
5 Copyright (c) 2010, Red Hat. All rights reserved.
6
71) Overview
82) Timing Devices
93) TSC Hardware
104) Virtualization Problems
11
12=========================================================================
13
141) Overview
15
16One of the most complicated parts of the X86 platform, and specifically,
17the virtualization of this platform is the plethora of timing devices available
18and the complexity of emulating those devices. In addition, virtualization of
19time introduces a new set of challenges because it introduces a multiplexed
20division of time beyond the control of the guest CPU.
21
22First, we will describe the various timekeeping hardware available, then
23present some of the problems which arise and solutions available, giving
24specific recommendations for certain classes of KVM guests.
25
26The purpose of this document is to collect data and information relevant to
27timekeeping which may be difficult to find elsewhere, specifically,
28information relevant to KVM and hardware-based virtualization.
29
30=========================================================================
31
322) Timing Devices
33
34First we discuss the basic hardware devices available. TSC and the related
35KVM clock are special enough to warrant a full exposition and are described in
36the following section.
37
382.1) i8254 - PIT
39
40One of the first timer devices available is the programmable interrupt timer,
41or PIT. The PIT has a fixed frequency 1.193182 MHz base clock and three
42channels which can be programmed to deliver periodic or one-shot interrupts.
43These three channels can be configured in different modes and have individual
44counters. Channel 1 and 2 were not available for general use in the original
45IBM PC, and historically were connected to control RAM refresh and the PC
46speaker. Now the PIT is typically integrated as part of an emulated chipset
47and a separate physical PIT is not used.
48
49The PIT uses I/O ports 0x40 - 0x43. Access to the 16-bit counters is done
50using single or multiple byte access to the I/O ports. There are 6 modes
51available, but not all modes are available to all timers, as only timer 2
52has a connected gate input, required for modes 1 and 5. The gate line is
53controlled by port 61h, bit 0, as illustrated in the following diagram.
54
55 -------------- ----------------
56| | | |
57| 1.1932 MHz |---------->| CLOCK OUT | ---------> IRQ 0
58| Clock | | | |
59 -------------- | +->| GATE TIMER 0 |
60 | ----------------
61 |
62 | ----------------
63 | | |
64 |------>| CLOCK OUT | ---------> 66.3 KHZ DRAM
65 | | | (aka /dev/null)
66 | +->| GATE TIMER 1 |
67 | ----------------
68 |
69 | ----------------
70 | | |
71 |------>| CLOCK OUT | ---------> Port 61h, bit 5
72 | | |
73Port 61h, bit 0 ---------->| GATE TIMER 2 | \_.---- ____
74 ---------------- _| )--|LPF|---Speaker
75 / *---- \___/
76Port 61h, bit 1 -----------------------------------/
77
78The timer modes are now described.
79
80Mode 0: Single Timeout. This is a one-shot software timeout that counts down
81 when the gate is high (always true for timers 0 and 1). When the count
82 reaches zero, the output goes high.
83
84Mode 1: Triggered One-shot. The output is intially set high. When the gate
85 line is set high, a countdown is initiated (which does not stop if the gate is
86 lowered), during which the output is set low. When the count reaches zero,
87 the output goes high.
88
89Mode 2: Rate Generator. The output is initially set high. When the countdown
90 reaches 1, the output goes low for one count and then returns high. The value
91 is reloaded and the countdown automatically resumes. If the gate line goes
92 low, the count is halted. If the output is low when the gate is lowered, the
93 output automatically goes high (this only affects timer 2).
94
95Mode 3: Square Wave. This generates a high / low square wave. The count
96 determines the length of the pulse, which alternates between high and low
97 when zero is reached. The count only proceeds when gate is high and is
98 automatically reloaded on reaching zero. The count is decremented twice at
99 each clock to generate a full high / low cycle at the full periodic rate.
100 If the count is even, the clock remains high for N/2 counts and low for N/2
101 counts; if the clock is odd, the clock is high for (N+1)/2 counts and low
102 for (N-1)/2 counts. Only even values are latched by the counter, so odd
103 values are not observed when reading. This is the intended mode for timer 2,
104 which generates sine-like tones by low-pass filtering the square wave output.
105
106Mode 4: Software Strobe. After programming this mode and loading the counter,
107 the output remains high until the counter reaches zero. Then the output
108 goes low for 1 clock cycle and returns high. The counter is not reloaded.
109 Counting only occurs when gate is high.
110
111Mode 5: Hardware Strobe. After programming and loading the counter, the
112 output remains high. When the gate is raised, a countdown is initiated
113 (which does not stop if the gate is lowered). When the counter reaches zero,
114 the output goes low for 1 clock cycle and then returns high. The counter is
115 not reloaded.
116
117In addition to normal binary counting, the PIT supports BCD counting. The
118command port, 0x43 is used to set the counter and mode for each of the three
119timers.
120
121PIT commands, issued to port 0x43, using the following bit encoding:
122
123Bit 7-4: Command (See table below)
124Bit 3-1: Mode (000 = Mode 0, 101 = Mode 5, 11X = undefined)
125Bit 0 : Binary (0) / BCD (1)
126
127Command table:
128
1290000 - Latch Timer 0 count for port 0x40
130 sample and hold the count to be read in port 0x40;
131 additional commands ignored until counter is read;
132 mode bits ignored.
133
1340001 - Set Timer 0 LSB mode for port 0x40
135 set timer to read LSB only and force MSB to zero;
136 mode bits set timer mode
137
1380010 - Set Timer 0 MSB mode for port 0x40
139 set timer to read MSB only and force LSB to zero;
140 mode bits set timer mode
141
1420011 - Set Timer 0 16-bit mode for port 0x40
143 set timer to read / write LSB first, then MSB;
144 mode bits set timer mode
145
1460100 - Latch Timer 1 count for port 0x41 - as described above
1470101 - Set Timer 1 LSB mode for port 0x41 - as described above
1480110 - Set Timer 1 MSB mode for port 0x41 - as described above
1490111 - Set Timer 1 16-bit mode for port 0x41 - as described above
150
1511000 - Latch Timer 2 count for port 0x42 - as described above
1521001 - Set Timer 2 LSB mode for port 0x42 - as described above
1531010 - Set Timer 2 MSB mode for port 0x42 - as described above
1541011 - Set Timer 2 16-bit mode for port 0x42 as described above
155
1561101 - General counter latch
157 Latch combination of counters into corresponding ports
158 Bit 3 = Counter 2
159 Bit 2 = Counter 1
160 Bit 1 = Counter 0
161 Bit 0 = Unused
162
1631110 - Latch timer status
164 Latch combination of counter mode into corresponding ports
165 Bit 3 = Counter 2
166 Bit 2 = Counter 1
167 Bit 1 = Counter 0
168
169 The output of ports 0x40-0x42 following this command will be:
170
171 Bit 7 = Output pin
172 Bit 6 = Count loaded (0 if timer has expired)
173 Bit 5-4 = Read / Write mode
174 01 = MSB only
175 10 = LSB only
176 11 = LSB / MSB (16-bit)
177 Bit 3-1 = Mode
178 Bit 0 = Binary (0) / BCD mode (1)
179
1802.2) RTC
181
182The second device which was available in the original PC was the MC146818 real
183time clock. The original device is now obsolete, and usually emulated by the
184system chipset, sometimes by an HPET and some frankenstein IRQ routing.
185
186The RTC is accessed through CMOS variables, which uses an index register to
187control which bytes are read. Since there is only one index register, read
188of the CMOS and read of the RTC require lock protection (in addition, it is
189dangerous to allow userspace utilities such as hwclock to have direct RTC
190access, as they could corrupt kernel reads and writes of CMOS memory).
191
192The RTC generates an interrupt which is usually routed to IRQ 8. The interrupt
193can function as a periodic timer, an additional once a day alarm, and can issue
194interrupts after an update of the CMOS registers by the MC146818 is complete.
195The type of interrupt is signalled in the RTC status registers.
196
197The RTC will update the current time fields by battery power even while the
198system is off. The current time fields should not be read while an update is
199in progress, as indicated in the status register.
200
201The clock uses a 32.768kHz crystal, so bits 6-4 of register A should be
202programmed to a 32kHz divider if the RTC is to count seconds.
203
204This is the RAM map originally used for the RTC/CMOS:
205
206Location Size Description
207------------------------------------------
20800h byte Current second (BCD)
20901h byte Seconds alarm (BCD)
21002h byte Current minute (BCD)
21103h byte Minutes alarm (BCD)
21204h byte Current hour (BCD)
21305h byte Hours alarm (BCD)
21406h byte Current day of week (BCD)
21507h byte Current day of month (BCD)
21608h byte Current month (BCD)
21709h byte Current year (BCD)
2180Ah byte Register A
219 bit 7 = Update in progress
220 bit 6-4 = Divider for clock
221 000 = 4.194 MHz
222 001 = 1.049 MHz
223 010 = 32 kHz
224 10X = test modes
225 110 = reset / disable
226 111 = reset / disable
227 bit 3-0 = Rate selection for periodic interrupt
228 000 = periodic timer disabled
229 001 = 3.90625 uS
230 010 = 7.8125 uS
231 011 = .122070 mS
232 100 = .244141 mS
233 ...
234 1101 = 125 mS
235 1110 = 250 mS
236 1111 = 500 mS
2370Bh byte Register B
238 bit 7 = Run (0) / Halt (1)
239 bit 6 = Periodic interrupt enable
240 bit 5 = Alarm interrupt enable
241 bit 4 = Update-ended interrupt enable
242 bit 3 = Square wave interrupt enable
243 bit 2 = BCD calendar (0) / Binary (1)
244 bit 1 = 12-hour mode (0) / 24-hour mode (1)
245 bit 0 = 0 (DST off) / 1 (DST enabled)
246OCh byte Register C (read only)
247 bit 7 = interrupt request flag (IRQF)
248 bit 6 = periodic interrupt flag (PF)
249 bit 5 = alarm interrupt flag (AF)
250 bit 4 = update interrupt flag (UF)
251 bit 3-0 = reserved
252ODh byte Register D (read only)
253 bit 7 = RTC has power
254 bit 6-0 = reserved
25532h byte Current century BCD (*)
256 (*) location vendor specific and now determined from ACPI global tables
257
2582.3) APIC
259
260On Pentium and later processors, an on-board timer is available to each CPU
261as part of the Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller. The APIC is
262accessed through memory-mapped registers and provides interrupt service to each
263CPU, used for IPIs and local timer interrupts.
264
265Although in theory the APIC is a safe and stable source for local interrupts,
266in practice, many bugs and glitches have occurred due to the special nature of
267the APIC CPU-local memory-mapped hardware. Beware that CPU errata may affect
268the use of the APIC and that workarounds may be required. In addition, some of
269these workarounds pose unique constraints for virtualization - requiring either
270extra overhead incurred from extra reads of memory-mapped I/O or additional
271functionality that may be more computationally expensive to implement.
272
273Since the APIC is documented quite well in the Intel and AMD manuals, we will
274avoid repetition of the detail here. It should be pointed out that the APIC
275timer is programmed through the LVT (local vector timer) register, is capable
276of one-shot or periodic operation, and is based on the bus clock divided down
277by the programmable divider register.
278
2792.4) HPET
280
281HPET is quite complex, and was originally intended to replace the PIT / RTC
282support of the X86 PC. It remains to be seen whether that will be the case, as
283the de facto standard of PC hardware is to emulate these older devices. Some
284systems designated as legacy free may support only the HPET as a hardware timer
285device.
286
287The HPET spec is rather loose and vague, requiring at least 3 hardware timers,
288but allowing implementation freedom to support many more. It also imposes no
289fixed rate on the timer frequency, but does impose some extremal values on
290frequency, error and slew.
291
292In general, the HPET is recommended as a high precision (compared to PIT /RTC)
293time source which is independent of local variation (as there is only one HPET
294in any given system). The HPET is also memory-mapped, and its presence is
295indicated through ACPI tables by the BIOS.
296
297Detailed specification of the HPET is beyond the current scope of this
298document, as it is also very well documented elsewhere.
299
3002.5) Offboard Timers
301
302Several cards, both proprietary (watchdog boards) and commonplace (e1000) have
303timing chips built into the cards which may have registers which are accessible
304to kernel or user drivers. To the author's knowledge, using these to generate
305a clocksource for a Linux or other kernel has not yet been attempted and is in
306general frowned upon as not playing by the agreed rules of the game. Such a
307timer device would require additional support to be virtualized properly and is
308not considered important at this time as no known operating system does this.
309
310=========================================================================
311
3123) TSC Hardware
313
314The TSC or time stamp counter is relatively simple in theory; it counts
315instruction cycles issued by the processor, which can be used as a measure of
316time. In practice, due to a number of problems, it is the most complicated
317timekeeping device to use.
318
319The TSC is represented internally as a 64-bit MSR which can be read with the
320RDMSR, RDTSC, or RDTSCP (when available) instructions. In the past, hardware
321limitations made it possible to write the TSC, but generally on old hardware it
322was only possible to write the low 32-bits of the 64-bit counter, and the upper
32332-bits of the counter were cleared. Now, however, on Intel processors family
3240Fh, for models 3, 4 and 6, and family 06h, models e and f, this restriction
325has been lifted and all 64-bits are writable. On AMD systems, the ability to
326write the TSC MSR is not an architectural guarantee.
327
328The TSC is accessible from CPL-0 and conditionally, for CPL > 0 software by
329means of the CR4.TSD bit, which when enabled, disables CPL > 0 TSC access.
330
331Some vendors have implemented an additional instruction, RDTSCP, which returns
332atomically not just the TSC, but an indicator which corresponds to the
333processor number. This can be used to index into an array of TSC variables to
334determine offset information in SMP systems where TSCs are not synchronized.
335The presence of this instruction must be determined by consulting CPUID feature
336bits.
337
338Both VMX and SVM provide extension fields in the virtualization hardware which
339allows the guest visible TSC to be offset by a constant. Newer implementations
340promise to allow the TSC to additionally be scaled, but this hardware is not
341yet widely available.
342
3433.1) TSC synchronization
344
345The TSC is a CPU-local clock in most implementations. This means, on SMP
346platforms, the TSCs of different CPUs may start at different times depending
347on when the CPUs are powered on. Generally, CPUs on the same die will share
348the same clock, however, this is not always the case.
349
350The BIOS may attempt to resynchronize the TSCs during the poweron process and
351the operating system or other system software may attempt to do this as well.
352Several hardware limitations make the problem worse - if it is not possible to
353write the full 64-bits of the TSC, it may be impossible to match the TSC in
354newly arriving CPUs to that of the rest of the system, resulting in
355unsynchronized TSCs. This may be done by BIOS or system software, but in
356practice, getting a perfectly synchronized TSC will not be possible unless all
357values are read from the same clock, which generally only is possible on single
358socket systems or those with special hardware support.
359
3603.2) TSC and CPU hotplug
361
362As touched on already, CPUs which arrive later than the boot time of the system
363may not have a TSC value that is synchronized with the rest of the system.
364Either system software, BIOS, or SMM code may actually try to establish the TSC
365to a value matching the rest of the system, but a perfect match is usually not
366a guarantee. This can have the effect of bringing a system from a state where
367TSC is synchronized back to a state where TSC synchronization flaws, however
368small, may be exposed to the OS and any virtualization environment.
369
3703.3) TSC and multi-socket / NUMA
371
372Multi-socket systems, especially large multi-socket systems are likely to have
373individual clocksources rather than a single, universally distributed clock.
374Since these clocks are driven by different crystals, they will not have
375perfectly matched frequency, and temperature and electrical variations will
376cause the CPU clocks, and thus the TSCs to drift over time. Depending on the
377exact clock and bus design, the drift may or may not be fixed in absolute
378error, and may accumulate over time.
379
380In addition, very large systems may deliberately slew the clocks of individual
381cores. This technique, known as spread-spectrum clocking, reduces EMI at the
382clock frequency and harmonics of it, which may be required to pass FCC
383standards for telecommunications and computer equipment.
384
385It is recommended not to trust the TSCs to remain synchronized on NUMA or
386multiple socket systems for these reasons.
387
3883.4) TSC and C-states
389
390C-states, or idling states of the processor, especially C1E and deeper sleep
391states may be problematic for TSC as well. The TSC may stop advancing in such
392a state, resulting in a TSC which is behind that of other CPUs when execution
393is resumed. Such CPUs must be detected and flagged by the operating system
394based on CPU and chipset identifications.
395
396The TSC in such a case may be corrected by catching it up to a known external
397clocksource.
398
3993.5) TSC frequency change / P-states
400
401To make things slightly more interesting, some CPUs may change frequency. They
402may or may not run the TSC at the same rate, and because the frequency change
403may be staggered or slewed, at some points in time, the TSC rate may not be
404known other than falling within a range of values. In this case, the TSC will
405not be a stable time source, and must be calibrated against a known, stable,
406external clock to be a usable source of time.
407
408Whether the TSC runs at a constant rate or scales with the P-state is model
409dependent and must be determined by inspecting CPUID, chipset or vendor
410specific MSR fields.
411
412In addition, some vendors have known bugs where the P-state is actually
413compensated for properly during normal operation, but when the processor is
414inactive, the P-state may be raised temporarily to service cache misses from
415other processors. In such cases, the TSC on halted CPUs could advance faster
416than that of non-halted processors. AMD Turion processors are known to have
417this problem.
418
4193.6) TSC and STPCLK / T-states
420
421External signals given to the processor may also have the effect of stopping
422the TSC. This is typically done for thermal emergency power control to prevent
423an overheating condition, and typically, there is no way to detect that this
424condition has happened.
425
4263.7) TSC virtualization - VMX
427
428VMX provides conditional trapping of RDTSC, RDMSR, WRMSR and RDTSCP
429instructions, which is enough for full virtualization of TSC in any manner. In
430addition, VMX allows passing through the host TSC plus an additional TSC_OFFSET
431field specified in the VMCS. Special instructions must be used to read and
432write the VMCS field.
433
4343.8) TSC virtualization - SVM
435
436SVM provides conditional trapping of RDTSC, RDMSR, WRMSR and RDTSCP
437instructions, which is enough for full virtualization of TSC in any manner. In
438addition, SVM allows passing through the host TSC plus an additional offset
439field specified in the SVM control block.
440
4413.9) TSC feature bits in Linux
442
443In summary, there is no way to guarantee the TSC remains in perfect
444synchronization unless it is explicitly guaranteed by the architecture. Even
445if so, the TSCs in multi-sockets or NUMA systems may still run independently
446despite being locally consistent.
447
448The following feature bits are used by Linux to signal various TSC attributes,
449but they can only be taken to be meaningful for UP or single node systems.
450
451X86_FEATURE_TSC : The TSC is available in hardware
452X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP : The RDTSCP instruction is available
453X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC : The TSC rate is unchanged with P-states
454X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC : The TSC does not stop in C-states
455X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE : TSC sync checks are skipped (VMware)
456
4574) Virtualization Problems
458
459Timekeeping is especially problematic for virtualization because a number of
460challenges arise. The most obvious problem is that time is now shared between
461the host and, potentially, a number of virtual machines. Thus the virtual
462operating system does not run with 100% usage of the CPU, despite the fact that
463it may very well make that assumption. It may expect it to remain true to very
464exacting bounds when interrupt sources are disabled, but in reality only its
465virtual interrupt sources are disabled, and the machine may still be preempted
466at any time. This causes problems as the passage of real time, the injection
467of machine interrupts and the associated clock sources are no longer completely
468synchronized with real time.
469
470This same problem can occur on native harware to a degree, as SMM mode may
471steal cycles from the naturally on X86 systems when SMM mode is used by the
472BIOS, but not in such an extreme fashion. However, the fact that SMM mode may
473cause similar problems to virtualization makes it a good justification for
474solving many of these problems on bare metal.
475
4764.1) Interrupt clocking
477
478One of the most immediate problems that occurs with legacy operating systems
479is that the system timekeeping routines are often designed to keep track of
480time by counting periodic interrupts. These interrupts may come from the PIT
481or the RTC, but the problem is the same: the host virtualization engine may not
482be able to deliver the proper number of interrupts per second, and so guest
483time may fall behind. This is especially problematic if a high interrupt rate
484is selected, such as 1000 HZ, which is unfortunately the default for many Linux
485guests.
486
487There are three approaches to solving this problem; first, it may be possible
488to simply ignore it. Guests which have a separate time source for tracking
489'wall clock' or 'real time' may not need any adjustment of their interrupts to
490maintain proper time. If this is not sufficient, it may be necessary to inject
491additional interrupts into the guest in order to increase the effective
492interrupt rate. This approach leads to complications in extreme conditions,
493where host load or guest lag is too much to compensate for, and thus another
494solution to the problem has risen: the guest may need to become aware of lost
495ticks and compensate for them internally. Although promising in theory, the
496implementation of this policy in Linux has been extremely error prone, and a
497number of buggy variants of lost tick compensation are distributed across
498commonly used Linux systems.
499
500Windows uses periodic RTC clocking as a means of keeping time internally, and
501thus requires interrupt slewing to keep proper time. It does use a low enough
502rate (ed: is it 18.2 Hz?) however that it has not yet been a problem in
503practice.
504
5054.2) TSC sampling and serialization
506
507As the highest precision time source available, the cycle counter of the CPU
508has aroused much interest from developers. As explained above, this timer has
509many problems unique to its nature as a local, potentially unstable and
510potentially unsynchronized source. One issue which is not unique to the TSC,
511but is highlighted because of its very precise nature is sampling delay. By
512definition, the counter, once read is already old. However, it is also
513possible for the counter to be read ahead of the actual use of the result.
514This is a consequence of the superscalar execution of the instruction stream,
515which may execute instructions out of order. Such execution is called
516non-serialized. Forcing serialized execution is necessary for precise
517measurement with the TSC, and requires a serializing instruction, such as CPUID
518or an MSR read.
519
520Since CPUID may actually be virtualized by a trap and emulate mechanism, this
521serialization can pose a performance issue for hardware virtualization. An
522accurate time stamp counter reading may therefore not always be available, and
523it may be necessary for an implementation to guard against "backwards" reads of
524the TSC as seen from other CPUs, even in an otherwise perfectly synchronized
525system.
526
5274.3) Timespec aliasing
528
529Additionally, this lack of serialization from the TSC poses another challenge
530when using results of the TSC when measured against another time source. As
531the TSC is much higher precision, many possible values of the TSC may be read
532while another clock is still expressing the same value.
533
534That is, you may read (T,T+10) while external clock C maintains the same value.
535Due to non-serialized reads, you may actually end up with a range which
536fluctuates - from (T-1.. T+10). Thus, any time calculated from a TSC, but
537calibrated against an external value may have a range of valid values.
538Re-calibrating this computation may actually cause time, as computed after the
539calibration, to go backwards, compared with time computed before the
540calibration.
541
542This problem is particularly pronounced with an internal time source in Linux,
543the kernel time, which is expressed in the theoretically high resolution
544timespec - but which advances in much larger granularity intervals, sometimes
545at the rate of jiffies, and possibly in catchup modes, at a much larger step.
546
547This aliasing requires care in the computation and recalibration of kvmclock
548and any other values derived from TSC computation (such as TSC virtualization
549itself).
550
5514.4) Migration
552
553Migration of a virtual machine raises problems for timekeeping in two ways.
554First, the migration itself may take time, during which interrupts cannot be
555delivered, and after which, the guest time may need to be caught up. NTP may
556be able to help to some degree here, as the clock correction required is
557typically small enough to fall in the NTP-correctable window.
558
559An additional concern is that timers based off the TSC (or HPET, if the raw bus
560clock is exposed) may now be running at different rates, requiring compensation
561in some way in the hypervisor by virtualizing these timers. In addition,
562migrating to a faster machine may preclude the use of a passthrough TSC, as a
563faster clock cannot be made visible to a guest without the potential of time
564advancing faster than usual. A slower clock is less of a problem, as it can
565always be caught up to the original rate. KVM clock avoids these problems by
566simply storing multipliers and offsets against the TSC for the guest to convert
567back into nanosecond resolution values.
568
5694.5) Scheduling
570
571Since scheduling may be based on precise timing and firing of interrupts, the
572scheduling algorithms of an operating system may be adversely affected by
573virtualization. In theory, the effect is random and should be universally
574distributed, but in contrived as well as real scenarios (guest device access,
575causes of virtualization exits, possible context switch), this may not always
576be the case. The effect of this has not been well studied.
577
578In an attempt to work around this, several implementations have provided a
579paravirtualized scheduler clock, which reveals the true amount of CPU time for
580which a virtual machine has been running.
581
5824.6) Watchdogs
583
584Watchdog timers, such as the lock detector in Linux may fire accidentally when
585running under hardware virtualization due to timer interrupts being delayed or
586misinterpretation of the passage of real time. Usually, these warnings are
587spurious and can be ignored, but in some circumstances it may be necessary to
588disable such detection.
589
5904.7) Delays and precision timing
591
592Precise timing and delays may not be possible in a virtualized system. This
593can happen if the system is controlling physical hardware, or issues delays to
594compensate for slower I/O to and from devices. The first issue is not solvable
595in general for a virtualized system; hardware control software can't be
596adequately virtualized without a full real-time operating system, which would
597require an RT aware virtualization platform.
598
599The second issue may cause performance problems, but this is unlikely to be a
600significant issue. In many cases these delays may be eliminated through
601configuration or paravirtualization.
602
6034.8) Covert channels and leaks
604
605In addition to the above problems, time information will inevitably leak to the
606guest about the host in anything but a perfect implementation of virtualized
607time. This may allow the guest to infer the presence of a hypervisor (as in a
608red-pill type detection), and it may allow information to leak between guests
609by using CPU utilization itself as a signalling channel. Preventing such
610problems would require completely isolated virtual time which may not track
611real time any longer. This may be useful in certain security or QA contexts,
612but in general isn't recommended for real-world deployment scenarios.