blob: 7a17d9e58ad6586140e84a91a0a850b1b527e77a [file] [log] [blame]
Arjan van de Ven2af7f592006-01-09 15:59:18 -08001/*
2 * Assembly implementation of the mutex fastpath, based on atomic
3 * decrement/increment.
4 *
5 * started by Ingo Molnar:
6 *
7 * Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
8 */
9#ifndef _ASM_MUTEX_H
10#define _ASM_MUTEX_H
11
Gerd Hoffmann9a0b5812006-03-23 02:59:32 -080012#include "asm/alternative.h"
13
Arjan van de Ven2af7f592006-01-09 15:59:18 -080014/**
15 * __mutex_fastpath_lock - try to take the lock by moving the count
16 * from 1 to a 0 value
17 * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
18 * @fn: function to call if the original value was not 1
19 *
20 * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and call <fn> if it
21 * wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than 1
22 * even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
23 */
24#define __mutex_fastpath_lock(count, fail_fn) \
25do { \
26 unsigned int dummy; \
27 \
28 typecheck(atomic_t *, count); \
29 typecheck_fn(fastcall void (*)(atomic_t *), fail_fn); \
30 \
31 __asm__ __volatile__( \
Gerd Hoffmann9a0b5812006-03-23 02:59:32 -080032 LOCK_PREFIX " decl (%%eax) \n" \
Andi Kleen01215ad2006-09-26 10:52:31 +020033 " jns 1f \n" \
34 " call "#fail_fn" \n" \
Ingo Molnar73165b82006-01-10 22:07:44 +010035 "1: \n" \
36 \
Arjan van de Ven2af7f592006-01-09 15:59:18 -080037 :"=a" (dummy) \
38 : "a" (count) \
39 : "memory", "ecx", "edx"); \
40} while (0)
41
42
43/**
44 * __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
45 * from 1 to a 0 value
46 * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
47 * @fail_fn: function to call if the original value was not 1
48 *
49 * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and call <fail_fn> if it
50 * wasn't 1 originally. This function returns 0 if the fastpath succeeds,
51 * or anything the slow path function returns
52 */
53static inline int
54__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count,
55 int fastcall (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
56{
57 if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
58 return fail_fn(count);
59 else
60 return 0;
61}
62
63/**
64 * __mutex_fastpath_unlock - try to promote the mutex from 0 to 1
65 * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
66 * @fail_fn: function to call if the original value was not 0
67 *
68 * try to promote the mutex from 0 to 1. if it wasn't 0, call <fail_fn>.
69 * In the failure case, this function is allowed to either set the value
70 * to 1, or to set it to a value lower than 1.
71 *
72 * If the implementation sets it to a value of lower than 1, the
73 * __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
74 * to return 0 otherwise.
75 */
76#define __mutex_fastpath_unlock(count, fail_fn) \
77do { \
78 unsigned int dummy; \
79 \
80 typecheck(atomic_t *, count); \
81 typecheck_fn(fastcall void (*)(atomic_t *), fail_fn); \
82 \
83 __asm__ __volatile__( \
Gerd Hoffmann9a0b5812006-03-23 02:59:32 -080084 LOCK_PREFIX " incl (%%eax) \n" \
Andi Kleen01215ad2006-09-26 10:52:31 +020085 " jg 1f \n" \
86 " call "#fail_fn" \n" \
Ingo Molnar73165b82006-01-10 22:07:44 +010087 "1: \n" \
88 \
Arjan van de Ven2af7f592006-01-09 15:59:18 -080089 :"=a" (dummy) \
90 : "a" (count) \
91 : "memory", "ecx", "edx"); \
92} while (0)
93
94#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 1
95
96/**
97 * __mutex_fastpath_trylock - try to acquire the mutex, without waiting
98 *
99 * @count: pointer of type atomic_t
100 * @fail_fn: fallback function
101 *
102 * Change the count from 1 to a value lower than 1, and return 0 (failure)
103 * if it wasn't 1 originally, or return 1 (success) otherwise. This function
104 * MUST leave the value lower than 1 even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
105 * Additionally, if the value was < 0 originally, this function must not leave
106 * it to 0 on failure.
107 */
108static inline int
109__mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
110{
111 /*
112 * We have two variants here. The cmpxchg based one is the best one
113 * because it never induce a false contention state. It is included
114 * here because architectures using the inc/dec algorithms over the
115 * xchg ones are much more likely to support cmpxchg natively.
116 *
117 * If not we fall back to the spinlock based variant - that is
118 * just as efficient (and simpler) as a 'destructive' probing of
119 * the mutex state would be.
120 */
121#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
Linus Torvalds4cec8732006-01-11 15:50:47 -0800122 if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
Arjan van de Ven2af7f592006-01-09 15:59:18 -0800123 return 1;
124 return 0;
125#else
126 return fail_fn(count);
127#endif
128}
129
130#endif