blob: a4e3921564883a53b317140032a92127b96988a8 [file] [log] [blame]
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +02001
2 ------------------------------
3 ****** perf by examples ******
4 ------------------------------
5
6[ From an e-mail by Ingo Molnar, http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/346 ]
7
8
9First, discovery/enumeration of available counters can be done via
10'perf list':
11
12titan:~> perf list
13 [...]
14 kmem:kmalloc [Tracepoint event]
15 kmem:kmem_cache_alloc [Tracepoint event]
16 kmem:kmalloc_node [Tracepoint event]
17 kmem:kmem_cache_alloc_node [Tracepoint event]
18 kmem:kfree [Tracepoint event]
19 kmem:kmem_cache_free [Tracepoint event]
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -080020 kmem:mm_page_free [Tracepoint event]
21 kmem:mm_page_free_batched [Tracepoint event]
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020022 kmem:mm_page_alloc [Tracepoint event]
23 kmem:mm_page_alloc_zone_locked [Tracepoint event]
24 kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain [Tracepoint event]
25 kmem:mm_page_alloc_extfrag [Tracepoint event]
26
27Then any (or all) of the above event sources can be activated and
28measured. For example the page alloc/free properties of a 'hackbench
29run' are:
30
31 titan:~> perf stat -e kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain -e kmem:mm_page_alloc
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -080032 -e kmem:mm_page_free_batched -e kmem:mm_page_free ./hackbench 10
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020033 Time: 0.575
34
35 Performance counter stats for './hackbench 10':
36
37 13857 kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain
38 27576 kmem:mm_page_alloc
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -080039 6025 kmem:mm_page_free_batched
40 20934 kmem:mm_page_free
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020041
42 0.613972165 seconds time elapsed
43
44You can observe the statistical properties as well, by using the
45'repeat the workload N times' feature of perf stat:
46
47 titan:~> perf stat --repeat 5 -e kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain -e
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -080048 kmem:mm_page_alloc -e kmem:mm_page_free_batched -e
49 kmem:mm_page_free ./hackbench 10
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020050 Time: 0.627
51 Time: 0.644
52 Time: 0.564
53 Time: 0.559
54 Time: 0.626
55
56 Performance counter stats for './hackbench 10' (5 runs):
57
58 12920 kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain ( +- 3.359% )
59 25035 kmem:mm_page_alloc ( +- 3.783% )
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -080060 6104 kmem:mm_page_free_batched ( +- 0.934% )
61 18376 kmem:mm_page_free ( +- 4.941% )
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020062
63 0.643954516 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.363% )
64
65Furthermore, these tracepoints can be used to sample the workload as
66well. For example the page allocations done by a 'git gc' can be
67captured the following way:
68
Jiri Olsa4a4d3712013-06-05 13:37:21 +020069 titan:~/git> perf record -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -c 1 ./git gc
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +020070 Counting objects: 1148, done.
71 Delta compression using up to 2 threads.
72 Compressing objects: 100% (450/450), done.
73 Writing objects: 100% (1148/1148), done.
74 Total 1148 (delta 690), reused 1148 (delta 690)
75 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.267 MB perf.data (~11679 samples) ]
76
77To check which functions generated page allocations:
78
79 titan:~/git> perf report
80 # Samples: 10646
81 #
82 # Overhead Command Shared Object
83 # ........ ............... ..........................
84 #
85 23.57% git-repack /lib64/libc-2.5.so
86 21.81% git /lib64/libc-2.5.so
87 14.59% git ./git
88 11.79% git-repack ./git
89 7.12% git /lib64/ld-2.5.so
90 3.16% git-repack /lib64/libpthread-2.5.so
91 2.09% git-repack /bin/bash
92 1.97% rm /lib64/libc-2.5.so
93 1.39% mv /lib64/ld-2.5.so
94 1.37% mv /lib64/libc-2.5.so
95 1.12% git-repack /lib64/ld-2.5.so
96 0.95% rm /lib64/ld-2.5.so
97 0.90% git-update-serv /lib64/libc-2.5.so
98 0.73% git-update-serv /lib64/ld-2.5.so
99 0.68% perf /lib64/libpthread-2.5.so
100 0.64% git-repack /usr/lib64/libz.so.1.2.3
101
102Or to see it on a more finegrained level:
103
104titan:~/git> perf report --sort comm,dso,symbol
105# Samples: 10646
106#
107# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
108# ........ ............... .......................... ......
109#
110 9.35% git-repack ./git [.] insert_obj_hash
111 9.12% git ./git [.] insert_obj_hash
112 7.31% git /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] memcpy
113 6.34% git-repack /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] _int_malloc
114 6.24% git-repack /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] memcpy
115 5.82% git-repack /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] __GI___fork
116 5.47% git /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] _int_malloc
117 2.99% git /lib64/libc-2.5.so [.] memset
118
119Furthermore, call-graph sampling can be done too, of page
120allocations - to see precisely what kind of page allocations there
121are:
122
Jiri Olsa4a4d3712013-06-05 13:37:21 +0200123 titan:~/git> perf record -g -e kmem:mm_page_alloc -c 1 ./git gc
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +0200124 Counting objects: 1148, done.
125 Delta compression using up to 2 threads.
126 Compressing objects: 100% (450/450), done.
127 Writing objects: 100% (1148/1148), done.
128 Total 1148 (delta 690), reused 1148 (delta 690)
129 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.963 MB perf.data (~42069 samples) ]
130
131 titan:~/git> perf report -g
132 # Samples: 10686
133 #
134 # Overhead Command Shared Object
135 # ........ ............... ..........................
136 #
137 23.25% git-repack /lib64/libc-2.5.so
138 |
139 |--50.00%-- _int_free
140 |
141 |--37.50%-- __GI___fork
142 | make_child
143 |
144 |--12.50%-- ptmalloc_unlock_all2
145 | make_child
146 |
147 --6.25%-- __GI_strcpy
148 21.61% git /lib64/libc-2.5.so
149 |
150 |--30.00%-- __GI_read
151 | |
152 | --83.33%-- git_config_from_file
153 | git_config
154 | |
155 [...]
156
157Or you can observe the whole system's page allocations for 10
158seconds:
159
160titan:~/git> perf stat -a -e kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain -e
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -0800161kmem:mm_page_alloc -e kmem:mm_page_free_batched -e
162kmem:mm_page_free sleep 10
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +0200163
164 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 10':
165
166 171585 kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain
167 322114 kmem:mm_page_alloc
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -0800168 73623 kmem:mm_page_free_batched
169 254115 kmem:mm_page_free
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +0200170
171 10.000591410 seconds time elapsed
172
173Or observe how fluctuating the page allocations are, via statistical
174analysis done over ten 1-second intervals:
175
176 titan:~/git> perf stat --repeat 10 -a -e kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain -e
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -0800177 kmem:mm_page_alloc -e kmem:mm_page_free_batched -e
178 kmem:mm_page_free sleep 1
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +0200179
180 Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (10 runs):
181
182 17254 kmem:mm_page_pcpu_drain ( +- 3.709% )
183 34394 kmem:mm_page_alloc ( +- 4.617% )
Konstantin Khlebnikov90a5d5a2012-01-10 15:07:10 -0800184 7509 kmem:mm_page_free_batched ( +- 4.820% )
185 25653 kmem:mm_page_free ( +- 3.672% )
Carlos R. Mafrac24b5132009-08-05 20:53:34 +0200186
187 1.058135029 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.089% )
188
189Or you can annotate the recorded 'git gc' run on a per symbol basis
190and check which instructions/source-code generated page allocations:
191
192 titan:~/git> perf annotate __GI___fork
193 ------------------------------------------------
194 Percent | Source code & Disassembly of libc-2.5.so
195 ------------------------------------------------
196 :
197 :
198 : Disassembly of section .plt:
199 : Disassembly of section .text:
200 :
201 : 00000031a2e95560 <__fork>:
202 [...]
203 0.00 : 31a2e95602: b8 38 00 00 00 mov $0x38,%eax
204 0.00 : 31a2e95607: 0f 05 syscall
205 83.42 : 31a2e95609: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
206 0.00 : 31a2e9560f: 0f 87 4d 01 00 00 ja 31a2e95762 <__fork+0x202>
207 0.00 : 31a2e95615: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
208
209( this shows that 83.42% of __GI___fork's page allocations come from
210 the 0x38 system call it performs. )
211
212etc. etc. - a lot more is possible. I could list a dozen of
213other different usecases straight away - neither of which is
214possible via /proc/vmstat.
215
216/proc/vmstat is not in the same league really, in terms of
217expressive power of system analysis and performance
218analysis.
219
220All that the above results needed were those new tracepoints
221in include/tracing/events/kmem.h.
222
223 Ingo
224
225