locking/mutex, drm: Introduce mutex_trylock_recursive()
By popular DRM demand, introduce mutex_trylock_recursive() to fix up the
two GEM users.
Without this it is very easy for these drivers to get stuck in
low-memory situations and trigger OOM. Work is in progress to remove the
need for this in at least i915.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
index 6d2e885..b77bca7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -20,13 +20,21 @@
static bool msm_gem_shrinker_lock(struct drm_device *dev, bool *unlock)
{
- if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex))
+ switch (mutex_trylock_recursive(&dev->struct_mutex)) {
+ case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_FAILED:
return false;
- *unlock = true;
- return true;
-}
+ case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_SUCCESS:
+ *unlock = true;
+ return true;
+ case MUTEX_TRYLOCK_RECURSIVE:
+ *unlock = false;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ BUG();
+}
static unsigned long
msm_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)