soreuseport: pass skb to secondary UDP socket lookup
This socket-lookup path did not pass along the skb in question
in my original BPF-based socket selection patch. The skb in the
udpN_lib_lookup2 path can be used for BPF-based socket selection just
like it is in the 'traditional' udpN_lib_lookup path.
udpN_lib_lookup2 kicks in when there are greater than 10 sockets in
the same hlist slot. Coincidentally, I chose 10 sockets per
reuseport group in my functional test, so the lookup2 path was not
excersised. This adds an additional set of tests with 20 sockets.
Fixes: 538950a1b752 ("soreuseport: setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF")
Fixes: 3ca8e4029969 ("soreuseport: BPF selection functional test")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
index 74ff099..bec1b5d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf.c
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@
if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_EBPF, &bpf_fd,
sizeof(bpf_fd)))
error(1, errno, "failed to set SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_EBPF");
+
+ close(bpf_fd);
}
static void attach_cbpf(int fd, uint16_t mod)
@@ -396,6 +398,9 @@
int main(void)
{
fprintf(stderr, "---- IPv4 UDP ----\n");
+ /* NOTE: UDP socket lookups traverse a different code path when there
+ * are > 10 sockets in a group. Run the bpf test through both paths.
+ */
test_reuseport_ebpf((struct test_params) {
.recv_family = AF_INET,
.send_family = AF_INET,
@@ -403,6 +408,13 @@
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8000,
.send_port_min = 9000});
+ test_reuseport_ebpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET,
+ .send_family = AF_INET,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8000,
+ .send_port_min = 9000});
test_reuseport_cbpf((struct test_params) {
.recv_family = AF_INET,
.send_family = AF_INET,
@@ -410,6 +422,13 @@
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8001,
.send_port_min = 9020});
+ test_reuseport_cbpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET,
+ .send_family = AF_INET,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8001,
+ .send_port_min = 9020});
test_extra_filter((struct test_params) {
.recv_family = AF_INET,
.protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
@@ -427,6 +446,13 @@
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8003,
.send_port_min = 9040});
+ test_reuseport_ebpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET6,
+ .send_family = AF_INET6,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8003,
+ .send_port_min = 9040});
test_reuseport_cbpf((struct test_params) {
.recv_family = AF_INET6,
.send_family = AF_INET6,
@@ -434,6 +460,13 @@
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8004,
.send_port_min = 9060});
+ test_reuseport_cbpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET6,
+ .send_family = AF_INET6,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8004,
+ .send_port_min = 9060});
test_extra_filter((struct test_params) {
.recv_family = AF_INET6,
.protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
@@ -448,6 +481,13 @@
.recv_family = AF_INET6,
.send_family = AF_INET,
.protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8006,
+ .send_port_min = 9080});
+ test_reuseport_ebpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET6,
+ .send_family = AF_INET,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8006,
.send_port_min = 9080});
@@ -458,6 +498,13 @@
.recv_socks = 10,
.recv_port = 8007,
.send_port_min = 9100});
+ test_reuseport_cbpf((struct test_params) {
+ .recv_family = AF_INET6,
+ .send_family = AF_INET,
+ .protocol = SOCK_DGRAM,
+ .recv_socks = 20,
+ .recv_port = 8007,
+ .send_port_min = 9100});
test_filter_without_bind();