net: sched: do not use tcf_proto 'tp' argument from call_rcu
Using the tcf_proto pointer 'tp' from inside the classifiers callback
is not valid because it may have been cleaned up by another call_rcu
occuring on another CPU.
'tp' is currently being used by tcf_unbind_filter() in this patch we
move instances of tcf_unbind_filter outside of the call_rcu() context.
This is safe to do because any running schedulers will either read the
valid class field or it will be zeroed.
And all schedulers today when the class is 0 do a lookup using the
same call used by the tcf_exts_bind(). So even if we have a running
classifier hit the null class pointer it will do a lookup and get
to the same result. This is particularly fragile at the moment because
the only way to verify this is to audit the schedulers call sites.
Reported-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangconf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_route.c b/net/sched/cls_route.c
index b665aee..6f22baa 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_route.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_route.c
@@ -269,9 +269,7 @@
route4_delete_filter(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct route4_filter *f = container_of(head, struct route4_filter, rcu);
- struct tcf_proto *tp = f->tp;
- tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
tcf_exts_destroy(&f->exts);
kfree(f);
}
@@ -297,6 +295,7 @@
next = rtnl_dereference(f->next);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(b->ht[h2], next);
+ tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
call_rcu(&f->rcu, route4_delete_filter);
}
}
@@ -338,6 +337,7 @@
route4_reset_fastmap(head);
/* Delete it */
+ tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
call_rcu(&f->rcu, route4_delete_filter);
/* Strip RTNL protected tree */
@@ -545,8 +545,10 @@
route4_reset_fastmap(head);
*arg = (unsigned long)f;
- if (fold)
+ if (fold) {
+ tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &fold->res);
call_rcu(&fold->rcu, route4_delete_filter);
+ }
return 0;
errout: