ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
index 083d655..8d2e866 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@
break;
default:
+
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Unknown Register ID: 0x%X", register_id));
status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
break;
@@ -491,7 +492,6 @@
break;
case ACPI_REGISTER_PM1_CONTROL: /* PM1 A/B: 16-bit access each */
-
/*
* Perform a read first to preserve certain bits (per ACPI spec)
* Note: This includes SCI_EN, we never want to change this bit
@@ -520,7 +520,6 @@
break;
case ACPI_REGISTER_PM2_CONTROL: /* 8-bit access */
-
/*
* For control registers, all reserved bits must be preserved,
* as per the ACPI spec.
@@ -555,6 +554,7 @@
break;
default:
+
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Unknown Register ID: 0x%X", register_id));
status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
break;