iwlwifi: refactor some thermal throttle code
Some of the thermal throttle data structures and code
are really very intermingled with the sleep (power)
control code. They really do belong together in a way
since the thermal throttle code uses powersaving to
achieve its goal, but it's making it hard to work on
the powersave code. Split this up to make that easier.
I've also changed the antenna defines to an enum and
used the same enum for RX and TX.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
index 0c3ed23..2133155 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
@@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@
if (!iwl_ht_enabled(priv))
/* stay in Legacy */
tbl->action = IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_ANTENNA1;
- else if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE &&
+ else if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_SINGLE &&
tbl->action > IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_SISO)
tbl->action = IWL_LEGACY_SWITCH_SISO;
for (; ;) {
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@
u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0;
int ret;
- if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE &&
+ if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_SINGLE &&
tbl->action > IWL_SISO_SWITCH_ANTENNA2) {
/* stay in SISO */
tbl->action = IWL_SISO_SWITCH_ANTENNA1;
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@
u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0;
int ret;
- if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE) &&
+ if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_SINGLE) &&
(tbl->action < IWL_MIMO2_SWITCH_SISO_A ||
tbl->action > IWL_MIMO2_SWITCH_SISO_C)) {
/* switch in SISO */
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@
int ret;
u8 update_search_tbl_counter = 0;
- if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_SINGLE) &&
+ if ((iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_SINGLE) &&
(tbl->action < IWL_MIMO3_SWITCH_SISO_A ||
tbl->action > IWL_MIMO3_SWITCH_SISO_C)) {
/* switch in SISO */
@@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@
/* If we are searching for better modulation mode, check success. */
if (lq_sta->search_better_tbl &&
- (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_MULTI)) {
+ (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_MULTI)) {
/* If good success, continue using the "search" mode;
* no need to send new link quality command, since we're
* continuing to use the setup that we've been trying. */
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@
scale_action = 0;
if (!iwl_ht_enabled(priv) && !is_legacy(tbl->lq_type))
scale_action = -1;
- if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) != IWL_TX_MULTI &&
+ if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) != IWL_ANT_OK_MULTI &&
(is_mimo2(tbl->lq_type) || is_mimo3(tbl->lq_type)))
scale_action = -1;
switch (scale_action) {
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@
rate = rs_update_rate_tbl(priv, lq_sta,
tbl, index, is_green);
- if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_TX_MULTI) {
+ if (iwl_tx_ant_restriction(priv) == IWL_ANT_OK_MULTI) {
/* Should we stay with this modulation mode,
* or search for a new one? */
rs_stay_in_table(lq_sta);