bonding: handle slave's name change with primary_slave logic
Currently, if a slave's name change, we just pass it by. However, if the
slave is a current primary_slave, then we end up with using a slave, whose
name != params.primary, for primary_slave. And vice-versa, if we don't have
a primary_slave but have params.primary set - we will not detected a new
primary_slave.
Fix this by catching the NETDEV_CHANGENAME event and setting primary_slave
accordingly. Also, if the primary_slave was changed, issue a reselection of
the active slave, cause the priorities have changed.
Reported-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index f2fe6cb..f00dd45 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2860,9 +2860,27 @@
*/
break;
case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
- /*
- * TODO: handle changing the primary's name
- */
+ /* we don't care if we don't have primary set */
+ if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) ||
+ !bond->params.primary[0])
+ break;
+
+ if (slave == bond->primary_slave) {
+ /* slave's name changed - he's no longer primary */
+ bond->primary_slave = NULL;
+ } else if (!strcmp(slave_dev->name, bond->params.primary)) {
+ /* we have a new primary slave */
+ bond->primary_slave = slave;
+ } else { /* we didn't change primary - exit */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("%s: Primary slave changed to %s, reselecting active slave.\n",
+ bond->dev->name, bond->primary_slave ? slave_dev->name :
+ "none");
+ write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+ bond_select_active_slave(bond);
+ write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
break;
case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
bond_compute_features(bond);