lib/xz: Add fall-through comments to a switch statement
It's good style. I was also told that GCC 7 is more strict and might
give a warning when such comments are missing.
Signed-off-by: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@tukaani.org>
Suggested-by: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
diff --git a/lib/xz/xz_dec_stream.c b/lib/xz/xz_dec_stream.c
index ac809b1..bd1d182 100644
--- a/lib/xz/xz_dec_stream.c
+++ b/lib/xz/xz_dec_stream.c
@@ -583,6 +583,8 @@
if (ret != XZ_OK)
return ret;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_BLOCK_START:
/* We need one byte of input to continue. */
if (b->in_pos == b->in_size)
@@ -606,6 +608,8 @@
s->temp.pos = 0;
s->sequence = SEQ_BLOCK_HEADER;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_BLOCK_HEADER:
if (!fill_temp(s, b))
return XZ_OK;
@@ -616,6 +620,8 @@
s->sequence = SEQ_BLOCK_UNCOMPRESS;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_BLOCK_UNCOMPRESS:
ret = dec_block(s, b);
if (ret != XZ_STREAM_END)
@@ -623,6 +629,8 @@
s->sequence = SEQ_BLOCK_PADDING;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_BLOCK_PADDING:
/*
* Size of Compressed Data + Block Padding
@@ -643,6 +651,8 @@
s->sequence = SEQ_BLOCK_CHECK;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_BLOCK_CHECK:
if (s->check_type == XZ_CHECK_CRC32) {
ret = crc32_validate(s, b);
@@ -665,6 +675,8 @@
s->sequence = SEQ_INDEX_PADDING;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_INDEX_PADDING:
while ((s->index.size + (b->in_pos - s->in_start))
& 3) {
@@ -687,6 +699,8 @@
s->sequence = SEQ_INDEX_CRC32;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_INDEX_CRC32:
ret = crc32_validate(s, b);
if (ret != XZ_STREAM_END)
@@ -695,6 +709,8 @@
s->temp.size = STREAM_HEADER_SIZE;
s->sequence = SEQ_STREAM_FOOTER;
+ /* Fall through */
+
case SEQ_STREAM_FOOTER:
if (!fill_temp(s, b))
return XZ_OK;