x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros
Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control
registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus
the fix is more a cosmetical change.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
index fdbed3a..dcfd450 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX
for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) {
- int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS;
+ int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS;
if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i))
msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter;
else
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
if (msrs->counters[i].addr)
release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
}
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) {
if (msrs->controls[i].addr)
release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
}