POWERPC: Bring the fs_no calculation to the relevant SoC enumeration
The fs_no mean used to be fs_enet driver driven, hence it was an
enumeration across all the possible fs_enet "users" in the SoC. Now, with
QE on the pipeline, and to make DTS descriptions more clear, fs_no features
relevant SoC part number, with additional field to describe the SoC type.
Another reason for that is now not only fs_enet is going to utilize those
stuff. There might be UART, HLDC, and even USB, so to prevent confusion and
be ready for upcoming OF_device transfer, fs_enet and cpm_uart drivers were
updated in that concern, as well as the relevant DTS.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
index 4e72bb9..022ed27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
@@ -622,6 +622,7 @@
id = get_property(np, "device-id", NULL);
fs_enet_data.fs_no = *id;
+ strcpy(fs_enet_data.fs_type, model);
mdio = of_get_parent(phy);
ret = of_address_to_resource(mdio, 0, &res);
@@ -635,7 +636,7 @@
fs_enet_data.clk_tx = *((u32 *) get_property(np, "tx-clock", NULL));
if (strstr(model, "FCC")) {
- int fcc_index = fs_get_fcc_index(*id);
+ int fcc_index = *id - 1;
fs_enet_data.dpram_offset = (u32)cpm_dpram_addr(0);
fs_enet_data.rx_ring = 32;
@@ -688,6 +689,7 @@
struct resource r[3];
struct fs_uart_platform_info cpm_uart_data;
const int *id;
+ const char *model;
memset(r, 0, sizeof(r));
memset(&cpm_uart_data, 0, sizeof(cpm_uart_data));
@@ -716,6 +718,10 @@
id = get_property(np, "device-id", NULL);
cpm_uart_data.fs_no = *id;
+
+ model = (char*)get_property(np, "model", NULL);
+ strcpy(cpm_uart_data.fs_type, model);
+
cpm_uart_data.uart_clk = ppc_proc_freq;
cpm_uart_data.tx_num_fifo = 4;