bnx2x: Checkpatch compliance
Checkpatch compliance
The latest version of checkpatch found the following style errors in the
code
Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x.h b/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
index 33437e5..b468f90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
@@ -40,20 +40,20 @@
#define DP(__mask, __fmt, __args...) do { \
if (bp->msglevel & (__mask)) \
printk(DP_LEVEL "[%s:%d(%s)]" __fmt, __func__, __LINE__, \
- bp->dev?(bp->dev->name):"?", ##__args); \
+ bp->dev ? (bp->dev->name) : "?", ##__args); \
} while (0)
/* errors debug print */
#define BNX2X_DBG_ERR(__fmt, __args...) do { \
if (bp->msglevel & NETIF_MSG_PROBE) \
printk(KERN_ERR "[%s:%d(%s)]" __fmt, __func__, __LINE__, \
- bp->dev?(bp->dev->name):"?", ##__args); \
+ bp->dev ? (bp->dev->name) : "?", ##__args); \
} while (0)
/* for errors (never masked) */
#define BNX2X_ERR(__fmt, __args...) do { \
printk(KERN_ERR "[%s:%d(%s)]" __fmt, __func__, __LINE__, \
- bp->dev?(bp->dev->name):"?", ##__args); \
+ bp->dev ? (bp->dev->name) : "?", ##__args); \
} while (0)
/* before we have a dev->name use dev_info() */