x86, numa: For each node, register the memory blocks actually used
Russ reported SGI UV is broken recently. He said:
| The SRAT table shows that memory range is spread over two nodes.
|
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 100000000-800000000
| SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 800000000-1000000000
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 1000000000-1080000000
|
|Previously, the kernel early_node_map[] would show three entries
|with the proper node.
|
|[ 0.000000] 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00800000
|[ 0.000000] 1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000
|[ 0.000000] 0: 0x01000000 -> 0x01080000
|
|The problem is recent community kernel early_node_map[] shows
|only two entries with the node 0 entry overlapping the node 1
|entry.
|
| 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x01080000
| 1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000
After looking at the changelog, Found out that it has been broken for a while by
following commit
|commit 8716273caef7f55f39fe4fc6c69c5f9f197f41f1
|Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
|Date: Fri Sep 25 15:20:04 2009 -0700
|
| x86: Export srat physical topology
Before that commit, register_active_regions() is called for every SRAT memory
entry right away.
Use nodememblk_range[] instead of nodes[] in order to make sure we
capture the actual memory blocks registered with each node. nodes[]
contains an extended range which spans all memory regions associated
with a node, but that does not mean that all the memory in between are
included.
Reported-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CB27BDF.5000800@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> 2.6.33 .34 .35 .36
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
1 file changed