drm/i915: s/__i915_wait_request/i915_wait_request/
There is only one wait on request function now, so drop the "expert"
indication of leading __.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
index bc19980..26ca697 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.h
@@ -214,10 +214,10 @@
#define IS_RPS_CLIENT(p) (!IS_ERR(p))
#define IS_RPS_USER(p) (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))
-int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
- bool interruptible,
- s64 *timeout,
- struct intel_rps_client *rps)
+int i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
+ bool interruptible,
+ s64 *timeout,
+ struct intel_rps_client *rps)
__attribute__((nonnull(1)));
static inline u32 intel_engine_get_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@
if (!request)
return 0;
- return __i915_wait_request(request, true, NULL, NULL);
+ return i915_wait_request(request, true, NULL, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@
if (!request)
return 0;
- ret = __i915_wait_request(request, true, NULL, NULL);
+ ret = i915_wait_request(request, true, NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;