[PATCH] coredump: don't take tasklist_lock
This patch removes tasklist_lock from zap_threads().
This is safe wrt:
do_exit:
The caller holds mm->mmap_sem. This means that task which
shares the same ->mm can't pass exit_mm(), so it can't be
unhashed from init_task.tasks or ->thread_group lists.
fork:
None of sub-threads can fork after zap_process(leader). All
processes which were created before this point should be
visible to zap_threads() because copy_process() adds the new
process to the tail of init_task.tasks list, and ->siglock
lock/unlock provides a memory barrier.
de_thread:
It does list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, ¤t->tasks).
So zap_threads() will see either old or new leader, it does
not matter. However, it can change p->sighand, so we should
use lock_task_sighand() in zap_process().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index b58ba7d..49fa012 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1373,7 +1373,11 @@
struct task_struct *t;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&start->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ /*
+ * start->sighand can't disappear, but may be
+ * changed by de_thread()
+ */
+ lock_task_sighand(start, &flags);
start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
@@ -1386,7 +1390,7 @@
}
} while ((t = next_thread(t)) != start);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&start->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ unlock_task_sighand(start, &flags);
}
static void zap_threads(struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -1404,7 +1408,7 @@
complete(vfork_done);
}
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(g) {
p = g;
do {
@@ -1415,7 +1419,7 @@
}
} while ((p = next_thread(p)) != g);
}
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static void coredump_wait(struct mm_struct *mm)