ACPI: maintain a single list of _HID and _CID IDs
There's no need to treat _HID and _CID differently. Keeping them in
a single list makes code that uses the IDs a little simpler because it
can just traverse the list rather than checking "do we have a HID?",
"do we have any CIDs?"
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
index ff963d4..3a4478f 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@
acpi_handle temp = NULL;
acpi_status status;
struct pnp_dev *dev;
+ struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
/*
* If a PnPacpi device is not present , the device
@@ -193,15 +194,12 @@
if (dev->capabilities & PNP_CONFIGURABLE)
pnpacpi_parse_resource_option_data(dev);
- if (device->flags.compatible_ids) {
- struct acpica_device_id_list *cid_list = device->pnp.cid_list;
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < cid_list->count; i++) {
- if (!ispnpidacpi(cid_list->ids[i].string))
- continue;
- pnp_add_id(dev, cid_list->ids[i].string);
- }
+ list_for_each_entry(id, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
+ if (!strcmp(id->id, acpi_device_hid(device)))
+ continue;
+ if (!ispnpidacpi(id->id))
+ continue;
+ pnp_add_id(dev, id->id);
}
/* clear out the damaged flags */