[media] v4l2-dv-timings: support interlaced in v4l2_print_dv_timings
The v4l2_print_dv_timings() didn't log the interlaced format correctly. The timings
for the bottom field weren't logged and the fields per second value was half of what
it should have been.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c
index 8986610..9031405 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dv-timings.c
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@
htot = V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_WIDTH(bt);
vtot = V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_HEIGHT(bt);
+ if (bt->interlaced)
+ vtot /= 2;
if (prefix == NULL)
prefix = "";
@@ -282,6 +284,11 @@
dev_prefix, bt->vfrontporch,
(bt->polarities & V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL) ? "+" : "-",
bt->vsync, bt->vbackporch);
+ if (bt->interlaced)
+ pr_info("%s: vertical bottom field: fp = %u, %ssync = %u, bp = %u\n",
+ dev_prefix, bt->il_vfrontporch,
+ (bt->polarities & V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL) ? "+" : "-",
+ bt->il_vsync, bt->il_vbackporch);
pr_info("%s: pixelclock: %llu\n", dev_prefix, bt->pixelclock);
pr_info("%s: flags (0x%x):%s%s%s%s%s\n", dev_prefix, bt->flags,
(bt->flags & V4L2_DV_FL_REDUCED_BLANKING) ?