x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_matching_microcode
... to has_newer_microcode() as it does exactly that: checks
whether binary data @mc has newer microcode patch than the
applied one. Move @mc to be the first function arg too.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431860101-14847-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
index 3564299..8e87e6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
#define exttable_size(et) ((et)->count * EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE + EXT_HEADER_SIZE)
-extern int get_matching_microcode(unsigned int csig, int cpf, int rev, void *mc);
+extern int has_newer_microcode(void *mc, unsigned int csig, int cpf, int rev);
extern int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err);
extern int get_matching_sig(unsigned int csig, int cpf, void *mc);