NFS: teach nfs_neg_need_reval to understand LOOKUP_RCU
This requires nfs_check_verifier to take an rcu_walk flag, and requires
an rcu version of nfs_revalidate_inode which returns -ECHILD rather
than making an RPC call.
With this, nfs_lookup_revalidate can call nfs_neg_need_reval in
RCU-walk mode.
We can also move the LOOKUP_RCU check past the nfs_check_verifier()
call in nfs_lookup_revalidate.
If RCU_WALK prevents nfs_check_verifier or nfs_neg_need_reval from
doing a full check, they return a status indicating that a revalidation
is required. As this revalidation will not be possible in RCU_WALK
mode, -ECHILD will ultimately be returned, which is the desired result.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index 9927913..147fd17 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -1002,6 +1002,15 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_revalidate_inode);
+int nfs_revalidate_inode_rcu(struct nfs_server *server, struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (!(NFS_I(inode)->cache_validity &
+ (NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_LABEL))
+ && !nfs_attribute_cache_expired(inode))
+ return NFS_STALE(inode) ? -ESTALE : 0;
+ return -ECHILD;
+}
+
static int nfs_invalidate_mapping(struct inode *inode, struct address_space *mapping)
{
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);