SUNRPC: Make slot allocation more reliable
In xprt_alloc_slot(), the spin lock is only needed to provide atomicity
between the atomic_add_unless() failure and the call to xprt_add_backlog().
We do not actually need to hold it across the memory allocation itself.
By dropping the lock, we can use a more resilient GFP_NOFS allocation,
just as we now do in the rest of the RPC client code.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index 3e63c5e..4654a99 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -1047,13 +1047,15 @@
return ret;
}
-static struct rpc_rqst *xprt_dynamic_alloc_slot(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, gfp_t gfp_flags)
+static struct rpc_rqst *xprt_dynamic_alloc_slot(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
{
struct rpc_rqst *req = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
if (!atomic_add_unless(&xprt->num_reqs, 1, xprt->max_reqs))
goto out;
- req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpc_rqst), gfp_flags);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
+ req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpc_rqst), GFP_NOFS);
+ spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
if (req != NULL)
goto out;
atomic_dec(&xprt->num_reqs);
@@ -1081,7 +1083,7 @@
list_del(&req->rq_list);
goto out_init_req;
}
- req = xprt_dynamic_alloc_slot(xprt, GFP_NOWAIT|__GFP_NOWARN);
+ req = xprt_dynamic_alloc_slot(xprt);
if (!IS_ERR(req))
goto out_init_req;
switch (PTR_ERR(req)) {