cxgb4/cxgb4vf: Allocate more queues for 25G and 100G adapter
We were missing check for 25G and 100G while checking port speed,
which lead to less number of queues getting allocated for 25G & 100G
adapters and leading to low throughput. Adding the missing check for
both NIC and vNIC driver.
Also fixes port advertisement for 25G and 100G in ethtool output.
Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
index c762a8c..3ceafb55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
@@ -4305,10 +4305,17 @@
.resume = eeh_resume,
};
+/* Return true if the Link Configuration supports "High Speeds" (those greater
+ * than 1Gb/s).
+ */
static inline bool is_x_10g_port(const struct link_config *lc)
{
- return (lc->supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_10G) != 0 ||
- (lc->supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_40G) != 0;
+ unsigned int speeds, high_speeds;
+
+ speeds = FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_V(FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_G(lc->supported));
+ high_speeds = speeds & ~(FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_100M | FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_1G);
+
+ return high_speeds != 0;
}
static inline void init_rspq(struct adapter *adap, struct sge_rspq *q,
@@ -4756,8 +4763,12 @@
bufp += sprintf(bufp, "1000/");
if (pi->link_cfg.supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_10G)
bufp += sprintf(bufp, "10G/");
+ if (pi->link_cfg.supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_25G)
+ bufp += sprintf(bufp, "25G/");
if (pi->link_cfg.supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_40G)
bufp += sprintf(bufp, "40G/");
+ if (pi->link_cfg.supported & FW_PORT_CAP_SPEED_100G)
+ bufp += sprintf(bufp, "100G/");
if (bufp != buf)
--bufp;
sprintf(bufp, "BASE-%s", t4_get_port_type_description(pi->port_type));