drm/i915: Properly sort MI coomand table
In the future, we may want to speed up command/register searching using
a bisection and so we require them to be in ascending order respectively
by command value or register address. However, this was not true for one
pair in the MI table; make it so.
Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@hboeck.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Hand-assemble patch from raw patch from Hanno and commit message from Chris.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
index 430571b..dc5d9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@
CMD( MI_ARB_ON_OFF, SMI, F, 1, R ),
CMD( MI_PREDICATE, SMI, F, 1, S ),
CMD( MI_TOPOLOGY_FILTER, SMI, F, 1, S ),
- CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
CMD( MI_SET_APPID, SMI, F, 1, S ),
+ CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
CMD( MI_SET_CONTEXT, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ),
CMD( MI_URB_CLEAR, SMI, !F, 0xFF, S ),
CMD( MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM, SMI, !F, 0x3F, B,