perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)
Commit 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field
interface") changed list_add() to perf_hpp__register_sort_field().
This resulted in a behavior change since the field was added to the tail
instead of the head. So the -o option is mostly ignored due to its
order in the list.
This patch fixes it by adding perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field().
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Fixes: 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field interface")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
index d4b6514..28c216e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ void perf_hpp_list__column_register(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+ struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
static inline void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
{
@@ -294,6 +296,11 @@ static inline void perf_hpp__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
}
+static inline void perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+ perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
+}
+
#define perf_hpp_list__for_each_format(_list, format) \
list_for_each_entry(format, &(_list)->fields, list)