clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
index 19bb179..aff87df 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static void em_sti_disable(struct em_sti_priv *p)
clk_disable_unprepare(p->clk);
}
-static cycle_t em_sti_count(struct em_sti_priv *p)
+static u64 em_sti_count(struct em_sti_priv *p)
{
- cycle_t ticks;
+ u64 ticks;
unsigned long flags;
/* the STI hardware buffers the 48-bit count, but to
@@ -121,14 +121,14 @@ static cycle_t em_sti_count(struct em_sti_priv *p)
* Always read STI_COUNT_H before STI_COUNT_L.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->lock, flags);
- ticks = (cycle_t)(em_sti_read(p, STI_COUNT_H) & 0xffff) << 32;
+ ticks = (u64)(em_sti_read(p, STI_COUNT_H) & 0xffff) << 32;
ticks |= em_sti_read(p, STI_COUNT_L);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->lock, flags);
return ticks;
}
-static cycle_t em_sti_set_next(struct em_sti_priv *p, cycle_t next)
+static u64 em_sti_set_next(struct em_sti_priv *p, u64 next)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct em_sti_priv *cs_to_em_sti(struct clocksource *cs)
return container_of(cs, struct em_sti_priv, cs);
}
-static cycle_t em_sti_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 em_sti_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return em_sti_count(cs_to_em_sti(cs));
}
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int em_sti_clock_event_next(unsigned long delta,
struct clock_event_device *ced)
{
struct em_sti_priv *p = ced_to_em_sti(ced);
- cycle_t next;
+ u64 next;
int safe;
next = em_sti_set_next(p, em_sti_count(p) + delta);