clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index 8f3488b..c8b9f834 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static u64 exynos4_read_count_64(void)
hi2 = readl_relaxed(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_U);
} while (hi != hi2);
- return ((cycle_t)hi << 32) | lo;
+ return ((u64)hi << 32) | lo;
}
/**
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static u32 notrace exynos4_read_count_32(void)
return readl_relaxed(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L);
}
-static cycle_t exynos4_frc_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 exynos4_frc_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return exynos4_read_count_32();
}
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void exynos4_mct_comp0_stop(void)
static void exynos4_mct_comp0_start(bool periodic, unsigned long cycles)
{
unsigned int tcon;
- cycle_t comp_cycle;
+ u64 comp_cycle;
tcon = readl_relaxed(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_TCON);