clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
index b150694..d02b510 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
static void __iomem *regbase;
-static cycle_t vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
int loops = msecs_to_loops(10);
writel(3, regbase + TIMER_CTRL_VAL);
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int vt8500_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
struct clock_event_device *evt)
{
int loops = msecs_to_loops(10);
- cycle_t alarm = clocksource.read(&clocksource) + cycles;
+ u64 alarm = clocksource.read(&clocksource) + cycles;
while ((readl(regbase + TIMER_AS_VAL) & TIMER_MATCH_W_ACTIVE)
&& --loops)
cpu_relax();