[ARM] omap: remove unnecessary calls to propagate_rate()
We've always called propagate_rate() in the parent function to
the .set_rate methods, so there's no point having the .set_rate
methods also call this heavy-weight function - it's mere
duplication of what's happening elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c
index ee1b9f2..80a58e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c
@@ -308,7 +308,6 @@
omap_sram_reprogram_clock(ptr->dpllctl_val, ptr->ckctl_val);
ck_dpll1.rate = ptr->pll_rate;
- propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
return 0;
}
@@ -333,9 +332,6 @@
ret = 0;
}
- if (unlikely(ret == 0 && (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES)))
- propagate_rate(clk);
-
return ret;
}
@@ -442,8 +438,6 @@
omap_writel(l, MOD_CONF_CTRL_1);
clk->rate = p_rate / (div + 1);
- if (unlikely(clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES))
- propagate_rate(clk);
return 0;
}
@@ -787,7 +781,6 @@
}
}
}
- propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
#else
/* Find the highest supported frequency and enable it */
if (omap1_select_table_rate(&virtual_ck_mpu, ~0)) {
@@ -796,9 +789,9 @@
omap_writew(0x2290, DPLL_CTL);
omap_writew(cpu_is_omap730() ? 0x3005 : 0x1005, ARM_CKCTL);
ck_dpll1.rate = 60000000;
- propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
}
#endif
+ propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
/* Cache rates for clocks connected to ck_ref (not dpll1) */
propagate_rate(&ck_ref);
printk(KERN_INFO "Clocking rate (xtal/DPLL1/MPU): "