bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?
While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse
Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code.
I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code.
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index 826cd52..6d04cfd 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
int (*rhook)(struct sk_buff *skb);
- if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK)
+ if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
return skb;
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source))