um/ptrace: Fix the syscall number update after a ptrace
Update the syscall number after each PTRACE_SETREGS on ORIG_*AX.
This is needed to get the potentially altered syscall number in the
seccomp filters after RET_TRACE.
This fix four seccomp_bpf tests:
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE
> seccomp_bpf.c:1560:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26)
> seccomp_bpf.c:1561:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_RET_TRACE
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE
> TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_RET_TRACE
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace
> seccomp_bpf.c:1622:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected -1 (18446744073709551615) == syscall(39) (26)
> seccomp_bpf.c:1623:TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace:Expected 1 (1) == (*__errno_location ()) (22)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.skip_after_ptrace
> [ RUN ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace
> TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1)
> [ FAIL ] TRACE_syscall.kill_after_ptrace
Fixes: 26703c636c1f ("um/ptrace: run seccomp after ptrace")
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
3 files changed