libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to
ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 021cdc4..5fd780e 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -2354,10 +2354,10 @@
qc->tf.command = ATA_CMD_PACKET;
if (ata_pio_use_silly(ap)) {
- qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
+ qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
qc->tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
} else {
- qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
+ qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
qc->tf.lbam = SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE;
qc->tf.lbah = 0;
}
@@ -2528,12 +2528,12 @@
if (using_pio || nodata) {
/* no data, or PIO data xfer */
if (nodata)
- qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA;
+ qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_NODATA;
else
- qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI;
+ qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_PIO;
} else {
/* DMA data xfer */
- qc->tf.protocol = ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA;
+ qc->tf.protocol = ATAPI_PROT_DMA;
qc->tf.feature |= ATAPI_PKT_DMA;
if (atapi_dmadir && (scmd->sc_data_direction != DMA_TO_DEVICE))