x86, intel, power: Correct the MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS message
Fix the printk_once() so that it actually prints (didn't print before
due to a stray comma.)
[ hpa: changed to an incremental patch and adjusted the description
accordingly. ]
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1107151732480.18606@x980
Cc: <table@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index da0d779..ed6086e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -465,11 +465,11 @@
u64 epb;
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
- if ((epb & 0xF) == 0) {
- printk_once(KERN_WARNING, "x86: updated energy_perf_bias"
- " to 'normal' from 'performance'\n"
- "You can view and update epb via utility,"
- " such as x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n");
+ if ((epb & 0xF) == ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE) {
+ printk_once(KERN_WARNING "ENERGY_PERF_BIAS:"
+ " Set to 'normal', was 'performance'\n"
+ "ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with"
+ " x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n");
epb = (epb & ~0xF) | ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL;
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
}