rwsem: fix rwsem_is_locked() bugs
rwsem_is_locked() tests ->activity without locks, so we should always keep
->activity consistent. However, the code in __rwsem_do_wake() breaks this
rule, it updates ->activity after _all_ readers waken up, this may give
some reader a wrong ->activity value, thus cause rwsem_is_locked() behaves
wrong.
Quote from Andrew:
"
- we have one or more processes sleeping in down_read(), waiting for access.
- we wake one or more processes up without altering ->activity
- they start to run and they do rwsem_is_locked(). This incorrectly
returns "false", because the waker process is still crunching away in
__rwsem_do_wake().
- the waker now alters ->activity, but it was too late.
"
So we need get a spinlock to protect this. And rwsem_is_locked() should
not block, thus we use spin_trylock_irqsave().
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: simplify code]
Reported-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Cc: Ben Woodard <bwoodard@llnl.gov>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 39a7411..ccf95bf 100644
--- a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -17,6 +17,19 @@
#define RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE 0x00000002
};
+int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int ret = 1;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) {
+ ret = (sem->activity != 0);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_is_locked);
+
/*
* initialise the semaphore
*/