tree 91a52918b036a07bf8008eeae6e7dccf967fa4e0
parent 3e6cd7a4b6a04cf354a18c9d2e7ecec8fa1772fb
author Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> 1291435953 -0500
committer Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 1292335554 +0100

workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true

Running the annotate branch profiler on three boxes, including my
main box that runs firefox, evolution, xchat, and is part of the distcc farm,
showed this with the likelys in the workqueue code:

 correct incorrect  %        Function                  File              Line
 ------- ---------  -        --------                  ----              ----
      96   996253  99 wq_worker_sleeping             workqueue.c          703
      96   996247  99 wq_worker_waking_up            workqueue.c          677

The likely()s in this case were assuming that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING will
most likely be false. But this is not the case. The reason is
(and shown by adding trace_printks and testing it) that most of the time
WORKER_PREP is set.

In worker_thread() we have:

	worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP);

	[ do work stuff ]

	worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false);

(that 'false' means not to wake up an idle worker)

The wq_worker_sleeping() is called from schedule when a worker thread
is putting itself to sleep. Which happens most of the time outside
of that [ do work stuff ].

The wq_worker_waking_up is called by the wakeup worker code, which
is also callod outside that [ do work stuff ].

Thus, the likely and unlikely used by those two functions are actually
backwards.

Remove the annotation and let gcc figure it out.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>