tree 2fe0a97307f9b3fe481f07713a271630951eb51b
parent 00171d3c7e3b738ba582c7a9b37408e796f49046
author Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> 1252362134 +0200
committer Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 1253115851 +0200

ext3: Add locking to ext3_do_update_inode

I've been struggling with this off and on while I've been testing the
data=guarded work.  The symptom is corrupted orphan lists and inodes
with the wrong i_size stored on disk.  I was convinced the
data=guarded code was just missing a call to ext3_mark_inode_dirty, but
tracing showed the i_disksize I was sending to ext3_mark_inode_dirty
wasn't actually making it to the drive.

ext3_mark_inode_dirty can be called without locks held (atime updates
and a few others), so the data=guarded code uses locks while updating
the in-memory inode, and then calls ext3_mark_inode_dirty
without any locks held.

But, ext3_mark_inode_dirty has no internal locking to make sure that
only one CPU is updating the buffer head at a time.  Generally this
works out ok because everyone that changes the inode then calls
ext3_mark_inode_dirty themselves.  Even though it races, eventually
someone updates the buffer heads and things move on.

But there is still a risk of the wrong values getting in, and the
data=guarded code seems to hit the race very often.

Since everyone that changes the inode also logs it, it should be
possible to fix this with some memory barriers.  I'll leave that as an
exercise to the reader and lock the buffer head instead.

It it probably a good idea to have a different patch series for lockless
bit flipping on the ext3 i_state field.  ext3_do_update_inode &= clears
EXT3_STATE_NEW without any locks held.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>