[NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: rename struct nf_conntrack_protocol
Rename 'struct nf_conntrack_protocol' to 'struct nf_conntrack_l4proto' in
order to help distinguish it from 'struct nf_conntrack_l3proto'. It gets
rather confusing with 'nf_conntrack_protocol'.
Signed-off-by: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
index 790f00d..08223a5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
#include <net/checksum.h>
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tuple.h>
-#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_protocol.h>
+#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l4proto.h>
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h>
unsigned long nf_ct_icmp_timeout __read_mostly = 30*HZ;
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
struct icmphdr icmp;
struct iphdr ip;
} _in, *inside;
- struct nf_conntrack_protocol *innerproto;
+ struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *innerproto;
struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h;
int dataoff;
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@
return -NF_ACCEPT;
}
- innerproto = __nf_ct_proto_find(PF_INET, inside->ip.protocol);
+ innerproto = __nf_ct_l4proto_find(PF_INET, inside->ip.protocol);
dataoff = skb->nh.iph->ihl*4 + sizeof(inside->icmp);
/* Are they talking about one of our connections? */
if (!nf_ct_get_tuple(skb, dataoff, dataoff + inside->ip.ihl*4, PF_INET,
@@ -321,11 +321,11 @@
}
#endif
-struct nf_conntrack_protocol nf_conntrack_protocol_icmp =
+struct nf_conntrack_l4proto nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmp =
{
.list = { NULL, NULL },
.l3proto = PF_INET,
- .proto = IPPROTO_ICMP,
+ .l4proto = IPPROTO_ICMP,
.name = "icmp",
.pkt_to_tuple = icmp_pkt_to_tuple,
.invert_tuple = icmp_invert_tuple,
@@ -343,4 +343,4 @@
#endif
};
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_conntrack_protocol_icmp);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmp);